From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 100A0384AB5A; Thu, 16 May 2024 09:22:26 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 100A0384AB5A
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1715851347;
	bh=VDZQSXEsjqc0eLf2wV8QGozOUQHf+rzqqkVQNJwPjl4=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=JQSNEVwmZmAujxYbzS/iALtC/FuVNuPh1MVrxatB6Vqf8zvBiYxjH+8LbN5Ncwb+w
	 UJdpRXLBxJkQJtUU3J+5xjBE0t+lPNllS/7jZ1mRgwHqyXRysBGuJoIuzqfaCRV3EZ
	 Aidw47BCTH9qhTEAd5/VolxGFqrhhAghf6MSZViE=
From: "ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug debug/115066] [debug, gsplit-dwarf, gdwarf-4, g3]
 DW_MACRO_define_strp used for debug_str_offsets index
Date: Thu, 16 May 2024 09:22:26 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: debug
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-debug
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 15.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-115066-4-jx2gg3u3qQ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-115066-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-115066-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D115066

--- Comment #12 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot =
Uni-Bielefeld.DE> ---
> --- Comment #11 from Tom de Vries <vries at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> (In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #10)
[...]
>> I wonder how best to handle this: just skip the test on sparc*-sun-solar=
is2*
>> && !gas?  Theoretically, there could be other targets with similar issue=
s.
>
> This looks like test-case issue, so re-closing the PR.

True, but it's often way simpler to discuss testcase issues in the
original PR rather than open new PRs for every single issue with a
testcase (and there's already been the comment character one here).

> How about:
> ...
> -/* { dg-final { scan-assembler {\.byte\t0xb\t[^\n\r]* Define macro strx}=
 } }
> */
> +/* { dg-final { scan-assembler {\.byte\t0xb\t[^\n\r]* Define macro
> strx|\.byte\t0x1\t[^\n\r]* Define macro}
> ...
> ?

Seems like an option, too (and would work on other affected targets
should they appear).  Tested on sparc-sun-solaris2.11 with as and gas.

Btw., I wonder which of the targets currently skipped with "split DWARF
unsupported" are instances of this problem, too: Solaris doesn't support
-gsplit-dwarf, still the test PASSes on Solaris/SPARC with gas and
Solaris/x86 with either assembler.=