public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/115120] Bad interaction between ivcanon and early break vectorization
Date: Fri, 17 May 2024 06:45:18 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-115120-4-fWSw2xWuxO@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-115120-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115120

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Blocks|                            |53947
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2024-05-17

--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Note this isn't really because of IVCANON but because the IV is live.  IVCANON
adds a downward counting IV historically to enable RTL doloop transforms.

One could argue this should nowadays be IVOPTs job (in the past IVOPTs was
done on RTL).

So what's really the issue is that IVOPTs does a bad job (I don't really
think it even tries) to replace one vector IV with another.

We could try to change IVCANON to avoid creating a canonical downward counting
IV if one already exists (I don't think it even avoids that case) and also
avoid creating a downward counting IV with step -1 when a upward counting
IV with step 1 already controls the exit and verify IVOPTs turns it into
a downward counting one when profitable.


Referenced Bugs:

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
[Bug 53947] [meta-bug] vectorizer missed-optimizations

  reply	other threads:[~2024-05-17  6:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-16 16:03 [Bug tree-optimization/115120] New: " acoplan at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-05-17  6:45 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2024-05-17  6:46 ` [Bug tree-optimization/115120] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-05-17  7:47 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-06-24 18:09 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-06-25  7:03 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-06-25 12:46 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-115120-4-fWSw2xWuxO@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).