public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/115120] Bad interaction between ivcanon and early break vectorization Date: Fri, 17 May 2024 06:45:18 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-115120-4-fWSw2xWuxO@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-115120-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115120 Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |53947 Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed| |2024-05-17 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Note this isn't really because of IVCANON but because the IV is live. IVCANON adds a downward counting IV historically to enable RTL doloop transforms. One could argue this should nowadays be IVOPTs job (in the past IVOPTs was done on RTL). So what's really the issue is that IVOPTs does a bad job (I don't really think it even tries) to replace one vector IV with another. We could try to change IVCANON to avoid creating a canonical downward counting IV if one already exists (I don't think it even avoids that case) and also avoid creating a downward counting IV with step -1 when a upward counting IV with step 1 already controls the exit and verify IVOPTs turns it into a downward counting one when profitable. Referenced Bugs: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947 [Bug 53947] [meta-bug] vectorizer missed-optimizations
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-17 6:45 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2024-05-16 16:03 [Bug tree-optimization/115120] New: " acoplan at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-05-17 6:45 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2024-05-17 6:46 ` [Bug tree-optimization/115120] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-05-17 7:47 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-06-24 18:09 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-06-25 7:03 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-06-25 12:46 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-115120-4-fWSw2xWuxO@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).