public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/115138] [15 Regression] Bootstrap compare-debug fail after r15-580-gf3e5f4c58591f5 Date: Wed, 22 May 2024 18:58:28 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-115138-4-VAb73nHJu1@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-115138-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115138 --- Comment #21 from Iain Buclaw <ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Now doing a fair comparison: Command: g++-11 -std=c++11 \ -fno-PIE -c -O3 -g -fno-checking -DIN_GCC -fno-exceptions \ -fno-rtti -fasynchronous-unwind-tables \ -W -Wall -Wno-narrowing -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wno-format \ -Wmissing-format-attribute -Wconditionally-supported \ -Woverloaded-virtual -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wno-variadic-macros \ -Wno-overlength-strings -fno-common -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -fno-PIE \ -I../stage1-gcc -I../../gcc -I../../gcc/. -I../../gcc/../include \ -I../../gcc/../libcpp/include -I../../gcc/../libcody \ -I../../gcc/../libdecnumber -I../../gcc/../libdecnumber/bid \ -I../libdecnumber -I../../gcc/../libbacktrace \ -o gimplify.o ../../gcc/gimplify.cc Optimized-tree dump around line 6529. ``` <bb 81> [local count: 302659225]: # _272 = PHI <is_gimple_reg_rhs_or_call(79), is_gimple_mem_rhs_or_call(80)> # DEBUG lhs => NULL # DEBUG final_pred => _272 # DEBUG BEGIN_STMT if (_272 != _547) goto <bb 83>; [53.47%] else goto <bb 82>; [46.53%] <bb 82> [local count: 301785332]: # DEBUG BEGIN_STMT _66 = MEM[(union tree_node * *)_1 + 32B]; _67 = _66->base.code; if (_67 == 163) goto <bb 84>; [34.00%] else goto <bb 93>; [66.00%] <bb 83> [local count: 161831887]: # DEBUG BEGIN_STMT ret_268 = gimplify_expr (_796, pre_p_252(D), post_p_253(D), _272, 1); # DEBUG ret => ret_268 # DEBUG BEGIN_STMT if (ret_268 == -2) goto <bb 14>; [0.54%] else goto <bb 82>; [99.46%] ``` Command #2: ../stage1-gcc/xg++ -B../stage1-gcc/ -B/usr/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ \ -nostdinc++ -B../stage1-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs \ -B../stage1-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/.libs \ -I../stage1-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/include/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu \ -I../stage1-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/include \ -I../../libstdc++-v3/libsupc++ \ -L../stage1-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs \ -L../stage1-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++/.libs \ -fno-PIE -c -O3 -g -fno-checking -DIN_GCC -fno-exceptions \ -fno-rtti -fasynchronous-unwind-tables \ -W -Wall -Wno-narrowing -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual \ -Wmissing-format-attribute -Wconditionally-supported \ -Woverloaded-virtual -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wno-variadic-macros \ -Wno-overlength-strings -fno-common -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -fno-PIE \ -I../stage2-gcc -I../../gcc -I../../gcc/. -I../../gcc/../include \ -I../../gcc/../libcpp/include -I../../gcc/../libcody \ -I../../gcc/../libdecnumber -I../../gcc/../libdecnumber/bid \ -I../libdecnumber -I../../gcc/../libbacktrace \ -o gimplify.o ../../gcc/gimplify.cc Output. ``` <bb 83> [local count: 302659226]: # _274 = PHI <is_gimple_reg_rhs_or_call(82), is_gimple_mem_rhs_or_call(81)> # DEBUG lhs => NULL # DEBUG final_pred => _274 # DEBUG BEGIN_STMT # DEBUG BEGIN_STMT ret_270 = gimplify_expr (_723, pre_p_253(D), post_p_254(D), _274, 1); # DEBUG ret => ret_270 # DEBUG BEGIN_STMT if (ret_270 == -2) goto <bb 16>; [0.54%] else goto <bb 84>; [99.46%] <bb 84> [local count: 301785333]: # DEBUG BEGIN_STMT _66 = MEM[(union tree_node * *)_1 + 32B]; _67 = _66->base.code; if (_67 == 163) goto <bb 85>; [34.00%] else goto <bb 90>; [66.00%] ``` Is this helpful enough to narrow it down?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-22 18:58 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2024-05-17 14:20 [Bug tree-optimization/115138] New: " iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-05-17 14:22 ` [Bug tree-optimization/115138] " iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-05-17 14:23 ` rguenther at suse dot de 2024-05-17 15:08 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-05-17 17:35 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-05-18 8:09 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org 2024-05-18 10:46 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-05-18 11:30 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-05-21 10:01 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-05-21 11:02 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-05-21 12:16 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-05-22 8:07 ` ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-05-22 8:27 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-05-22 8:29 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-05-22 9:02 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-05-22 11:59 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-05-22 15:43 ` ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-05-22 15:51 ` iains at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-05-22 17:12 ` ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-05-22 17:44 ` ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-05-22 18:34 ` ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-05-22 18:58 ` ibuclaw at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2024-05-23 9:24 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-05-23 12:39 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-05-23 12:39 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-05-26 5:35 lorena feirer
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-115138-4-VAb73nHJu1@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).