From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 6A3D43858282; Fri, 17 May 2024 15:08:46 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 6A3D43858282
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1715958526;
	bh=4hegGArtU7EG1rM0qwdLRtp3vhIjG8h8c/O1flJ4aAs=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=KhvhedO80dUQrBJEV5QKspQR555h2Gf1UA/PtMkoHw6cWCtoji+zJTfAkFHm4AIKC
	 I38iROuXvEXVEbReODLli7OSuMP8NMSm2QGMQiRJ6uvJbYOz2cMwuOwx+ZvSioUZaZ
	 dIi2XfKmnyNGnlEhmSEBRRitYMbYW69GUU54tBQw=
From: "iains at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/115138] [15 Regression] Bootstrap
 compare-debug fail after r15-580-gf3e5f4c58591f5
Date: Fri, 17 May 2024 15:08:45 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 15.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: iains at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 15.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-115138-4-gwehCbSnuQ@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-115138-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-115138-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D115138

--- Comment #3 from Iain Sandoe <iains at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to rguenther@suse.de from comment #2)
> > Am 17.05.2024 um 16:20 schrieb iains at gcc dot gnu.org <gcc-bugzilla@g=
cc.gnu.org>:
> >=20

> > where the stage1 compiler (and x86_64 Linux) produces _CSWTCH.154
> >=20
> > At present, still trying to figure out how to debug this further .. it'=
s D so
> > no preprocessed output - I guess will have to try tree dumps.
>=20
> Did the followup fix maybe resolve this?

unfortunately, not - the same behaviour is seen at r15-633 (so will have to=
 see
what can be done to debug).=