From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 11BF43858431; Fri, 24 May 2024 06:39:31 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 11BF43858431
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1716532771;
	bh=vJylOy0Hvy4Y2dbAr/cbWwUgkRq5HtqpPLnPXwiOAk8=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=PJysb6Zl4uukjKkRgL08dRMCNTBx9xQd4qMpCLvvK/iPygIKBPpalfIpWCcwfareq
	 uBWC+NmTgkLzgrj/fkJjxeBethYz9U5oxqLUTxQX3zBuLYobljQ2LIEnJri4jUlytU
	 wTAb8uy2h4oRK4A/b0ir4WX/tAsFYWZtW8npybLc=
From: "tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug testsuite/115140] [15 regression]
 libgomp.oacc-c++/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/acc_prof-kernels-1.c excess
 errors after r15-579-ga9251ab3c91c8c
Date: Fri, 24 May 2024 06:39:30 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: testsuite
X-Bugzilla-Version: 15.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: openacc, testsuite-fail
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 15.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_gcchost cf_gccbuild cc bug_status cf_gcctarget
 cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed
Message-ID: <bug-115140-4-E5654LJBr2@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-115140-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-115140-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D115140

Thomas Schwinge <tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Host|powerpc64-linux-gnu,        |
                   |powerpc64le-linux-gnu,      |
                   |*-*-solaris2.11             |
              Build|powerpc64-linux-gnu,        |
                   |powerpc64le-linux-gnu,      |
                   |*-*-solaris2.11             |
                 CC|                            |tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.o=
rg
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
             Target|powerpc64-linux-gnu,        |
                   |powerpc64le-linux-gnu,      |
                   |*-*-solaris2.11             |
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2024-05-24
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #3 from Thomas Schwinge <tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
So the PASS -> FAIL regressions are due to parloops (for '-O2') no longer
parallelizing the simple OpenACC 'kernels' construct at line 185 (and two
more):

    int x[N];
    #pragma acc kernels
    {
      for (int i =3D 0; i < N; ++i)
        x[i] =3D i * i;
    }

(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> Looks like a testsuite artifact?
>=20
> volatile // TODO PR90488
> static int state =3D -1;
>=20
> I've not looked as to why/how we are getting that to influence points-to
> solutions (note as we track also integers volatile on non-pointers can
> matter).

Yeah, it's not obvious to me how that 'state' variable would have such an
effect -- but I've not yet 'diff'ed the dumps.

On the other hand, it's highly likely that there is some relation, as no ot=
her
OpenACC 'kernels' test cases did regress.=