From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id C53DB3858282; Sat, 18 May 2024 13:15:42 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C53DB3858282 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1716038142; bh=xK5aKIhZh9NP1jivDiUSamJ+YQjmAlZ+A63JdtZNjKE=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=G1fp44UCOtoqMeEbYzShsDcArLyOmnFc4ky/qholjfiZYjUznom7W3a56Kl2vjwdz lnZKxresE6twEwGeIHHB3y9UdS9ugRTOHt8AR+jIfr05PtAt3x/NGjSraQFhRFDDzj 3LWfJ1Xv8g2LM9dNZ0HSrqCPUhvqvIjtygUc6LLM= From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/115143] [11/12/13/14/15 Regression] tree check: expected class 'type', have 'exceptional' (error_mark) in useless_type_conversion_p, at gimple-expr.cc:85 Date: Sat, 18 May 2024 13:15:42 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 15.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, needs-bisection X-Bugzilla-Severity: blocker X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 13.3 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: short_desc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D115143 Andrew Pinski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|[13/14/15 Regression] tree |[11/12/13/14/15 Regression] |check: expected class |tree check: expected class |'type', have 'exceptional' |'type', have 'exceptional' |(error_mark) in |(error_mark) in |useless_type_conversion_p, |useless_type_conversion_p, |at gimple-expr.cc:85 |at gimple-expr.cc:85 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- And GCC 11, and 12 too.=