From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id EDCF23858D38; Mon, 20 May 2024 23:20:38 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org EDCF23858D38
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1716247238;
	bh=RBJBIXGr4x/3RkxUqnTjpw+W0bgAH9lqKoApPeMLN60=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=szdRteR6Xv1Wcj/FsHzYfDfSV+lWCtCzlR8e5AxCsnHlTExR7DjBqqAeo4vI7EqjI
	 Vqp58CpcyixUneRVfheIV7t/ZsfVUHRgq5ni2rPRrvF4bIdQ8EiLLC5aL6JNHbXlj+
	 eDLhZhX1H2h0KVKRmlgHH8LkFnqdK/ikvVLwaSI4=
From: "olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/115148] [SH] [12/13/14 Regression]: libcanberra fails
 with 'unaligned opcodes detected in executable segment'
Date: Mon, 20 May 2024 23:20:38 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-115148-4-SkeCJZMzgO@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-115148-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-115148-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D115148

Oleg Endo <olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |vmakarov at redhat dot com

--- Comment #14 from Oleg Endo <olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #13)
> I can even confirm that reverting a7acb6dca941db2b1c135107dac3a34a20650d5c
> (with some minor merge adjustments) on current git master fixes the probl=
em
> for me.

Great.  Thanks a lot!

Vladimir, do you have any idea what could be going wrong here?  It seems af=
ter
your change in ira-costs.c, the emitted .align directive that is emitted in=
 in
sh.cc (barrier_align) gets moved around which results in wrongly aligned
labels.  It's difficult for me to imagine the connection of the two ...=