From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id D46E23858D35; Tue, 21 May 2024 08:28:06 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D46E23858D35
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1716280086;
	bh=JdCOVX1gVpk7rI8vKeG9hfvCFXsTDfzmta1MZhImpVE=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=fhpMHCd2wyrjiqJALQ32H7O92tF0hKXVrNtam+2n+VJGIxkJ3O6lTaLw8RDFyH7rJ
	 KFyX3IGfK7RXMjzyzwDM0nFfsBfmpCe4/R3IQ8nTKBkcfFMXAJwIWcyNIJpe8Zhwvp
	 4s7iQz/7Wt3DBKfu2YYdKz9h98qoYIok0g2bcjl8=
From: "olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/115148] [12/13/14/15 Regression][SH]: libcanberra fails
 with 'unaligned opcodes detected in executable segment'
Date: Tue, 21 May 2024 08:28:00 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, ra
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.4
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-115148-4-WGZe4y2qU3@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-115148-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-115148-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D115148

--- Comment #16 from Oleg Endo <olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #15)
> Created attachment 58258 [details]
> Diff of generated assembly without and with changes from PR99531
>=20
> I have generated a diff that shows the difference in the generated assemb=
ly
> without and with the patch a7acb6dca941db2b1c135107dac3a34a20650d5c.

That's great, thanks a lot!

This is the problematic hunks, which causes the wrong code alignment:

.LVL108:
        bt/s    .L178           !
        mov     #-1,r0  !, <retval>
@@ -1832,36 +1830,39 @@
        .byte   .L215-.L190
        .byte   .L181-.L190
 .LVL109:
-       .align 1
-.L192:
 .LBE111:
 .LBE110:
        .loc 1 234 9
        .loc 1 234 14
+       .align 1
+.L287:
+       .align 1
+.L288:=