From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 314BF3858D20; Sun, 19 May 2024 15:21:52 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 314BF3858D20 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1716132112; bh=ThmNOmGP4J++ZBCINIw35q0ptumXDJ48/yeI3JHyZx0=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=b+uhM9rWvcDMEndyVLvSFmgk7yvKrWtworMJ002xFakJDmx0P0erI+1EJvLYN74TY Us7BDy/FGZfHzlnw9XFhd/2t/n715YUwUKDMpEtJH7r4O2mfJ0EFTvTnBvlbQjrzcR wPhE3V8Z3DD7LJb8xfOpCbJN5RAkcm+VhZppwUME= From: "olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/115148] [SH] [12/13/14 Regression]: libcanberra fails with 'unaligned opcodes detected in executable segment' Date: Sun, 19 May 2024 15:21:51 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.1.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D115148 --- Comment #9 from Oleg Endo --- (In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #8) >=20 > It looks like something dpulicates the ".align 1" directive after the byte > table and then also duplicates it. Perhaps the directive is treated wron= gly > as an insn or something like that .....=20 Wanted to write: It looks like something duplicates the ".align 1" directive after the byte table and then also sinks it further down in the code between the other labels.=