From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 149BE3858D26; Thu, 23 May 2024 03:01:40 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 149BE3858D26 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1716433301; bh=+1u08V/Kn5UqrF7HpfEOtb+MOqtK2WfbTn3vau0McR8=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=N4vD283nKG1II++8PEzwHqSr/HJcf7Vdu/viJQwkZE2HZGzTiPa0TJP2SkzmhjOmw 4MD8ESieRlRmNGHM9fqqb4DDlvm95rMjXgjyNgaEoatw3PBCzy1odRzAQnqZCgssbW TaxzFBmvnpDPECz3wDmc3JmfkRNQXLWzRX40hbjA= From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/115201] Recursive binary search with struct iterator is not handled by tail Recursion Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 03:01:40 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.1.1 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D115201 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski --- Created attachment 58274 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=3D58274&action=3Dedit Slightly more reduced Slightly more reduced, foo3 should produce the same as foo4. Basically Tailr does not handle recusive calls with struct arguments really= .=