From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 1ED363858CD9; Fri, 24 May 2024 07:35:45 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 1ED363858CD9
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1716536145;
	bh=q0AmenljeDD3/1+2hnMTp2OBIdgJ4ssYDRCP6cCujss=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:From;
	b=sP4/HnZ4PNnjudRqo5yO0KRHxH6ab2qWkE9pTO+ubEzeFDzJ3i00qqmyNfbwtFoU5
	 l/z5QjbSRexYDRCi7G6I7EbarY45bBcjGBP1Zgw0rOSHLkpH+Y6Bgda/51nas8QCF5
	 PLpUbc3nnCmfZgC+eIzpsGCEPtKJJJLkZDrYBeoE=
From: "user202729 at protonmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/115210] New: Missed optimization opportunity
 in redundant copies for large structure
Date: Fri, 24 May 2024 07:35:44 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 15.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: user202729 at protonmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status
 bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-115210-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D115210

            Bug ID: 115210
           Summary: Missed optimization opportunity in redundant copies
                    for large structure
           Product: gcc
           Version: 15.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: tree-optimization
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: user202729 at protonmail dot com
  Target Milestone: ---

Code:

```
struct A{
        //long long a[128];
        long long a_1, a_2, a_3, a_4, a_5, a_6, a_7, a_8, a_9, a_10, a_11,
a_12, a_13, a_14, a_15, a_16, a_17, a_18, a_19, a_20, a_21, a_22, a_23, a_2=
4,
a_25, a_26, a_27, a_28, a_29, a_30, a_31, a_32, a_33, a_34, a_35, a_36, a_3=
7,
a_38, a_39, a_40, a_41, a_42, a_43, a_44, a_45, a_46, a_47, a_48, a_49, a_5=
0,
a_51, a_52, a_53, a_54, a_55, a_56, a_57, a_58, a_59, a_60, a_61, a_62, a_6=
3,
a_64, a_65, a_66, a_67, a_68, a_69, a_70, a_71, a_72, a_73, a_74, a_75, a_7=
6,
a_77, a_78, a_79, a_80, a_81, a_82, a_83, a_84, a_85, a_86, a_87, a_88, a_8=
9,
a_90, a_91, a_92, a_93, a_94, a_95, a_96, a_97, a_98, a_99, a_100, a_101,
a_102, a_103, a_104, a_105, a_106, a_107, a_108, a_109, a_110, a_111, a_112,
a_113, a_114, a_115, a_116, a_117, a_118, a_119, a_120, a_121, a_122, a_123,
a_124, a_125, a_126, a_127, a_128;
};
void f(A& u){
        A v=3Du;
        A w=3Dv;
        A x=3Dw;
        u=3Dx;
}
```

Both variants (with a large array or with a lot of fields) exhibits the bug=
. 4
occurrences of `rep movsq` are seen in the code.=