From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id E36773884607; Wed, 19 Jun 2024 15:38:59 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E36773884607
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1718811539;
	bh=WcRpdN8YcucfmVzh2qPpPj5j/LVXXGlUGuIHhqW2Ink=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=PfvDbhC+SYCX4l2mWX7ilx2fkUvleDVLRU47C89aPWTcFR0Bcp5Q+6oYw5wgn9oF9
	 jy9yXRrV1LQh7DBMrA6zzn+yaSBp2jqPeq+oVAsoGQmNWxaZM6JoGERyZ9RstjuZ1S
	 znWf1opYcAhMz9frL5zOTRLflWdIcy6TuFOdnMUA=
From: "vries at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug debug/115272] [debug] complex type is hard to related back to
 base type
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2024 15:38:59 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: debug
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: vries at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-115272-4-RHcnl2Vgsy@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-115272-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-115272-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D115272

--- Comment #5 from Tom de Vries <vries at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #4)
> With this patch:

So, would this approach be acceptable?

If so, I can put effort into doing a proper submission.=