From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 69A9F385840F; Thu, 30 May 2024 09:58:19 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 69A9F385840F
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1717063099;
	bh=7Dn7YQYgWqwhPinK6U0EtdERqRm1h5KgFJR2znGFFN0=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=jaTejtXSc70vT51y6Ilvt6fulUGVrNyUUbzLhy3is90+B2DfM45jVZFcXHmDRJxUm
	 nhsCeQLp6KQvJdIl3u2Z0wTrJVHpd075MythoM0K7blMk6FV1+6sH/a0H4Z63WDgRP
	 yx+LQX5SO4MCmNieQUqxsdd/jk8DF7vmbuObS51Q=
From: "ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug bootstrap/115284] [15 regression] SEGV in check_format_arg on
 Solaris/SPARC
Date: Thu, 30 May 2024 09:58:18 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: bootstrap
X-Bugzilla-Version: 15.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: hp at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 15.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-115284-4-hG21FKQk28@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-115284-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-115284-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D115284

--- Comment #8 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE <ro at CeBiTec dot U=
ni-Bielefeld.DE> ---
> --- Comment #6 from Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> BTW, I see the target list says sparc*-sun-solaris2.11 which seems a cutn=
pasto
> from some ancient template: that particular version is installed on cfarm=
211

It's not: I've tried bootstraps on sparc-sun-solaris2.11 and
sparcv9-sun-solaris2.11 to check if it's just a 32-bit issue.

> and a build log for a recent gcc checkout says "Configuration
> sparc-sun-solaris2.11 not supported" for the gcc dir.  (Please correct the

While the configure triples have no way to distinguish between Solaris
11.3 and 11.4, gcc/config.gcc explicitly checks for hosts running 11.4.

But I see what you mean: that's an error of mine moving 11.3 from
obsolete to unsupported.  The message should say

        sparc-sun-solaris2.11.3 not supported

instead.  Will fix.

> versions.)  BTW, it'd be nice to know it it reproduces for sparc-linux as=
 well.

I happen to have a Linux/sparc64 LDom around: I'll give it a whirl.=