From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 7740A3858CDA; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 17:24:57 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 7740A3858CDA DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1718645097; bh=ffk3tPJL3Gu0cA6PNMjq7Zor6ZmFAMTjkfDPRGlyMtQ=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=JZGt9P5GNF7HDV4EZ9Ke+LemgoFIHBDRF49PYf/hxzGybaSYPlWdcWOS/aNDaAucr arVGDug8NfeM8lDc8PLStilTjgYQsQhSsAXNrofCOoAUgHjZ+lPCWwAkMKImxR4Q0z Y3/HLZPWA2IMUb9uVaUVzRHakZPbIx56MzMaTr+s= From: "cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/115290] [12/13/14/15 Regression] tree check fail in c_tree_printer, at c/c-objc-common.cc:330 Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 17:24:57 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c X-Bugzilla-Version: 15.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic, ice-checking, ice-on-valid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 12.4 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D115290 --- Comment #3 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b63c7d92012f92e0517190cf263d29bbef8a06bf commit r15-1381-gb63c7d92012f92e0517190cf263d29bbef8a06bf Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: Mon Jun 17 19:24:05 2024 +0200 c-family: Fix -Warray-compare warning ICE [PR115290] The warning code uses %D to print the ARRAY_REF first operands. That works in the most common case where those operands are decls, but as can be seen on the following testcase, they can be other expressions with array type. Just changing %D to %E isn't enough, because then the diagnostics can suggest something like note: use '&(x) !=3D 0 ? (int (*)[32])&a : (int (*)[32])&b[0] =3D=3D &(= y) !=3D 0 ? (int (*)[32])&a : (int (*)[32])&b[0]' to compare the addresses which is a bad suggestion, the %E printing doesn't know that the warning code will want to add & before it and [0] after it. So, the following patch adds ()s around the operand as well, but does that only for non-decls, for decls keeps it as &arr[0] like before. 2024-06-17 Jakub Jelinek PR c/115290 * c-warn.cc (do_warn_array_compare): Use %E rather than %D for printing op0 and op1; if those operands aren't decls, also print parens around them. * c-c++-common/Warray-compare-3.c: New test.=