From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 2D9F83858C41; Thu, 20 Jun 2024 04:48:53 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 2D9F83858C41
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1718858933;
	bh=JhkHHh2a3LcvOkXiQBHi/Q/UL0+6pCWJJ37vew8I8Sw=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=cuYl9v+sSYzq6QBqTkLChYLh5qg/2nSwyP7AmnzeNB/z8m1j6eXIwnznMKtdqsWdL
	 XxCN1Q3Q40w5aibYEJ4LLRdcXdwf8S3cVWYlO643mH6Skva03WX6J4/vy2rOEk3P7z
	 vclcUTzc8r82WeuNbbG2UyI3zl1U0WspwIXorJgg=
From: "ramana at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/115308] std::experimental::simd<char> is not
 convertible to NEON intrinsic type with Clang
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 04:48:52 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 15.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: mkretz at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-115308-4-W8UaJIoVpx@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-115308-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-115308-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D115308

Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |ramana at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #5 from Ramana Radhakrishnan <ramana at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Matthias - are you looking to go further back than GCC 13 for this ?=