public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/115319] New: ICE when mutating a captured parameter in an explicit-this lambda if a capture is not trivially copyable
@ 2024-06-01 23:45 blubban at gmail dot com
2024-06-03 20:44 ` [Bug c++/115319] " mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: blubban at gmail dot com @ 2024-06-01 23:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115319
Bug ID: 115319
Summary: ICE when mutating a captured parameter in an
explicit-this lambda if a capture is not trivially
copyable
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: blubban at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
struct S
{
S() {}
S(const S&) {}
};
void a()
{
[i=0, x=S{}](this auto self) -> void
{
i++;
}();
}
-std=c++23 (optional, it throws a c++23-extensions warning and the same ICE
without it)
<source>: In lambda function:
<source>:11:9: internal compiler error: in gimplify_compound_lval, at
gimplify.cc:3576
11 | i++;
| ^
0x202ef4c internal_error(char const*, ...)
???:0
0x778915 fancy_abort(char const*, int, char const*)
???:0
0xc4c739 gimplify_expr(tree_node**, gimple**, gimple**, bool (*)(tree_node*),
int)
???:0
0xc55a00 gimplify_self_mod_expr(tree_node**, gimple**, gimple**, bool,
tree_node*)
???:0
0xc4cf52 gimplify_expr(tree_node**, gimple**, gimple**, bool (*)(tree_node*),
int)
???:0
0xc4e8c4 gimplify_expr(tree_node**, gimple**, gimple**, bool (*)(tree_node*),
int)
???:0
0xc4ca8d gimplify_expr(tree_node**, gimple**, gimple**, bool (*)(tree_node*),
int)
???:0
0xc4e8ae gimplify_expr(tree_node**, gimple**, gimple**, bool (*)(tree_node*),
int)
???:0
0xc50e8e gimplify_body(tree_node*, bool)
???:0
0xc51250 gimplify_function_tree(tree_node*)
???:0
0xaba647 cgraph_node::analyze()
???:0
0xabd9b1 symbol_table::finalize_compilation_unit()
???:0
Please submit a full bug report, with preprocessed source (by using
-freport-bug).
Please include the complete backtrace with any bug report.
See <https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/> for instructions.
Compiler returned: 1
Online reproducer: https://godbolt.org/z/Go6YdPTME
It seems that the explicit this makes by-value captures mutable, so I think
this is an ice-on-valid, but that is a pretty odd-sounding rule, so I'm not
entirely sure.
(one of my friends just discovered that posting GCC ICEs where I see them gets
them reduced and reported. Said friend claims to encounter like billions of
ICEs every day, so I may end up submitting a lot of ICEs and other gcc bugs in
the near future. I'll make sure to reduce every testcase, validate that it is a
bug, and try to find existing reports, of course)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-06-03 20:44 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-06-01 23:45 [Bug c++/115319] New: ICE when mutating a captured parameter in an explicit-this lambda if a capture is not trivially copyable blubban at gmail dot com
2024-06-03 20:44 ` [Bug c++/115319] " mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).