From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id CB41339867ED; Tue, 4 Jun 2024 15:10:04 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org CB41339867ED DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1717513804; bh=U7xF+PTzwBOOzlF6BOSHS7ThHP90ECxvpp+IyunlrtY=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=BZeTU/p3Rt7Elzt+4Ij3QzrAoHHntQs6aIFPs7VHvdAN4IpnosQyDN9FwwUwmTetY PnWqfdswvH52jiap00ewPH1JhgGO2yaV+WrLzMe1BmLpAE+9Sur74lfAoqRC4ywPKh lD+RDDcXh4ZLZUzlxOcJS/pONYs9A0XgFtjYJMpY= From: "jakub at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c/115345] [12/13/14/15 Regression] Different outputs compared to GCC 11- and MSVC/Clang Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2024 15:10:04 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c X-Bugzilla-Version: 12.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: everconfirmed cf_reconfirmed_on short_desc bug_status cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D115345 Jakub Jelinek changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed| |2024-06-04 Summary|[12/13/14 REGRESSION] / |[12/13/14/15 Regression] |Different outputs compared |Different outputs compared |to GCC 11- and MSVC/Clang |to GCC 11- and MSVC/Clang Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING CC| |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Please see https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/ for what we need, we need a self-conta= ined preprocessed testcase, which you haven't provided. You should start by compiling the code with -fsanitize=3Dundefined and/or -fsanitize=3Daddress, see if it reports anything, if not, create a minimal self-contained reproducer.=