From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 3377B3858433; Wed, 5 Jun 2024 18:39:26 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 3377B3858433 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1717612767; bh=6ZdR2fvq1XDeHB76ul9jWVmocg/B+2LH4Fu9jchJV5Q=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=wLy5MnSRhm43iFzygAlCv7mSu+Kby8aUzgmHRJAqMlpDrrU3+sJTLPxjdwjD5K0Xb VZa/P02iydt/rc4gKTk+bIr4oWVaTqJjJFCrDl0jP5H1WbyQDDJ62LKj/aW32jlK9l HkBFcVvMmKHSBgual+eDjZinYxTnx8hMFJA7/BIM= From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/115364] [11/12/13/14/15 Regression] ICE-on-invalid when calling non-const template member on const object Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2024 18:39:26 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown X-Bugzilla-Keywords: diagnostic, error-recovery, ice-checking, ice-on-invalid-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 11.5 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone short_desc cf_reconfirmed_on everconfirmed bug_status keywords Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D115364 Andrew Pinski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|--- |11.5 Summary|ICE-on-invalid when calling |[11/12/13/14/15 Regression] |non-const template member |ICE-on-invalid when calling |on const object |non-const template member | |on const object Last reconfirmed| |2024-06-05 Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Keywords| |diagnostic, error-recovery, | |ice-checking --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- >Probably because it's just a tree check; from what I've heard, they=20 Yes it does not show up with release checking set so most folks won't see t= he ICE in this case and it is only trying to find the location of the argument which in this case it is this which does not really have a location. Anyways confirmed, 99% sure it was introduced by r8-3378-g9003adc732305c .=