From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 813FB38DC2C3; Fri, 7 Jun 2024 05:59:31 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 813FB38DC2C3 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1717739971; bh=HN/bdRRPjwzbTdFDQ4oOAlCqR7LOqZ7hMgGQDKxBeTk=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=KyZSEPjVG2GfbLA1PyryRsc6FtPlFyfRKw+Y33bFhkLJ+93guaSQrOu6Q9x+oRwhT fufAUBFhnx3tJR+zT3qC9QscTDRCT57rymd2IAf5DuI5wVSnVdZsPB0QOhaJxi+z1l 0OFGJClbNq7y1vuQLk6vj1A86ejaJwwt99FmlL64= From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/115372] [15 Regression] RISCV pr97428.c scan-tree-dump-times after r15-812-gc71886f2ca2 Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2024 05:59:30 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 15.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: testsuite-fail X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 15.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: target_milestone keywords cc cf_gcctarget Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D115372 Richard Biener changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|--- |15.0 Keywords| |testsuite-fail CC| |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org Target| |riscv --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- I don't remember seeing FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr97428.c in the precommit CI, th= is one should get one SLP instance and seeing zero means it now fails to SLP on RISC-V. With a cross and rv64gcv I don't see this failure (on top of trunk= ). Ah, for me it's XFAILed because of ! vect_hw_misalign - do you use addition= al flags? But even adding -mno-strict-align doesn't help. Oh, the dejagnu harness uses check_effective_target_riscv_v_misalign_ok which _runs_ a testcase ... which of course fails for my simple cc1 cross (w/o binutils and w/o qemu set up). Is the precommit CI any better here?=