From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 396B538DC2FC; Fri,  7 Jun 2024 06:18:15 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 396B538DC2FC
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1717741095;
	bh=bO3Ir5sTryCRiu4VqVGnVMXGsdn82Nz0E3ZOo7zJZQg=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=G2dxoGn8nAPYKz0ta15cOQi0OIHMQQkG5LD6i9ROe8KNxZifwNnGk0faMExl2+udY
	 4hMq4hXuGAD5AyCq8/SrJZFxORAUR7d9Q/skdqgrAhKf1JzMXO80zliMU9K8dqCw8J
	 ZTAP6LRsHCZLZ/rwYLvTT2l4oA9x2QiMi3JZzUFc=
From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/115381] Missed deoptimization opportunity
 when comparing two different linker symbols
Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2024 06:18:14 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 15.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_reconfirmed_on bug_status everconfirmed cc
Message-ID: <bug-115381-4-S97EO9PVke@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-115381-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-115381-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D115381

Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2024-06-07
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
                 CC|                            |hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Doesn't seem to help here.  Related testcase:

extern int x;
extern int y;

int z(){ return &x =3D=3D &y; }

possibly -fno-semantic-interposition doesn't cover the definitions being
aliases of each other.  Defining TU:

int x(){}
int __attribute__((alias("x"))) y();

I believe this is wrong-code from clang.=