From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id D9A603858D37; Mon, 10 Jun 2024 07:53:36 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org D9A603858D37 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1718006016; bh=UNwZh/LgRDCPsTomTnLjdH3uvDz+iJIoLCW3RcfQzIY=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=gejPoVAxoSvu5qKteQ4P/sBHVnWss6OV5cZi3nB8nOo8gaFvVsLsqQSQPH+0gN6nG 5LSTOymG1t9KmPWXgVDm3aSmqCRc/KE2gUK/tPnU61TaHqFi+JPQwST02HFT+c+dKn JTc/BeWksIXBDbqLp8nG9TFKwDeDJt96F64aoCXA= From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/115404] [15 Regression] possibly wrong code on glibc-2.39 since r15-1113-gde05e44b2ad963 Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 07:53:36 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 15.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 15.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D115404 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Uro=C5=A1 Bizjak from comment #4) > I can hit ICE with the following testcase: Then it is most likely a dup of bug 115387 .=