From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id E3E0A3894C27; Thu, 20 Jun 2024 22:49:53 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E3E0A3894C27
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1718923793;
	bh=76Zy+tYPoX4xOB5M16N9vSEek5KkSVked5oPmlNDngQ=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=s9pdXB8BzogGC3b2kXvNaYZ9br8IJmOqJZqWrCoR4WhlAdHD2MrVxW7xu1Moqx0BF
	 CmOZb723xVi2QmOJfsVOgvl8/9zvBVp7mvU3wLTSDZZW2Ax92u3yTUF6KKcSYEpyxU
	 S8zS0IyyhgVeMM7AY62Ag1hF+7q9B0y91PBtiGuI=
From: "broly at mac dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/115408] regression between gcc 13.3.0 and 14.1.0 using
 -mips16 and -minterlink-mips16
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 22:49:53 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: link-failure
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: broly at mac dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: WAITING
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-115408-4-cwMbL7uegp@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-115408-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-115408-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D115408

--- Comment #13 from gagan sidhu (broly) <broly at mac dot com> ---
oh i see, i didn't realise that thumb was pure 16 bit.

my apologies.

so i guess i meant thumb2, which would have the same effect of the
mips16/minterlink-mips16 flags that i use to "collapse" 32 bit executables?*

https://stackoverflow.com/a/71378041

apparently it's all called thumb though? not trying to escape your (very
welcome) correction, but i just wanted to share my surprise at learning thi=
s.

--
* often a nice savings in binary size.

of course i concede if you use a sophisticated compression algorithm on the
root file system containing these binaries, there is a significant reductio=
n in
the benefit of the root filesystem compression (possibly even detrimental).=