From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 50BDD3882047; Thu, 13 Jun 2024 03:21:38 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 50BDD3882047
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1718248898;
	bh=CrOf2Sv9CgMhA3eLhpir78YBRcSpKQAeh64MYPUELS8=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=qHt5ULh6VK0y1PVQOzUoA6/7CpY4IAXd/Pep8ge1VEKJPXCR9kVA4lheenvfkFE2N
	 yxvwHu8tAlyzgYiwSsRP4vof2lSbxP4E3oVgzZ0ts2YwlMiUerk8FU6fP6GHXHH6LD
	 LWSRH3Lk8oaAQuiZCEjMW6vch/UhjMR9XC7GbSvM=
From: "tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/115464] ICE when building libaom on arm64 (neon sve
 bridge usage with tbl/perm)
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 03:21:37 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: target
X-Bugzilla-Version: 15.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-115464-4-8HFUzoIHQ0@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-115464-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-115464-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D115464

--- Comment #7 from Tamar Christina <tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Tamar Christina from comment #6)
> (In reply to Richard Sandiford from comment #5)
> > In this kind of situation, we should go through a fresh pseudo rather t=
han
> > try to take the subreg directly.
>=20
> I did try that but fwprop pushed it back in.

Ahh no, I used force_reg, doh.. Fair.=