From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 5A1F3388215E; Thu, 13 Jun 2024 18:15:23 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 5A1F3388215E
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1718302523;
	bh=hLjeykMx/sp0s9nmxu6wWQuXkl8ZpmE4mLpymV2fx5g=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=osCxrXdLsqK1ehKThB8Caq7/NcsL3uvCKJf8aMSmZePxBQbqIO0KKl1EiP3Lwav0D
	 F4Uovi6kiF4tOj7mVeCNdfY4OcEj1m4yYHFN9SbgG8d417vwhgyvZc7zQ67xphDVUV
	 C9i0yOj7us+KLqCmSzjsdMuUeIc90/c1uFOnr+Do=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/115480] Difference between trivial copyability of std::pair
 under Clang in C++23
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2024 18:15:23 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 15.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-115480-4-YYAxfGFyfh@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-115480-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-115480-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D115480

--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---

  template<typename _Tp>
    struct is_trivially_copyable
    : public integral_constant<bool, __is_trivially_copyable(_Tp)>


Well it is clang front-end issue though it looks like GCC had a similar iss=
ue
too.=