From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id E72653882100; Sat, 15 Jun 2024 18:23:07 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E72653882100
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1718475787;
	bh=Uaq0D+8L/XLKKr9zFX18UOPNzg8kFfvRfrttFenV8z0=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=UXR1cVmQ8a1yN/B2idpiL//Xgpf1p3K1ByYwHN7LeqYG0kNMC6oDtPxjytj/y5Zko
	 6/WMtGxJ3U3LoZXVAnJYW3hwXQ7oEMspOon/fM6TAQL2SWbYclqSeH0j0EQXQZN78Q
	 Um3nmfxEpsvvODSg50TIWgIo4eT8oW89YttAW/nY=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/115497] [15 Regression] __is_pointer doesn't compile
 with clang since 014879ea4c86b3b8ab6b61a1226ee5b31e816c8b
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2024 18:23:07 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 15.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: redi at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 15.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-115497-4-xBAv9hXjK9@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-115497-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-115497-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D115497

--- Comment #12 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #11)
> Although that class template has been there for years, so if any library
> like abseil was using the built-in, they're already have the problem that
> libstdc++ now has.

It looks like the abseil code is not using __is_pointer directly at all, but
rather the standard headers here. I suspect we should just rename the
__is_pointer template to workaround this clang oddness (and add a comment on
why the name is not __is_pointer).=