From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 33DA83858D26; Sun, 16 Jun 2024 18:53:41 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 33DA83858D26
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1718564021;
	bh=fYK+Najie3lnh2SFhY2X7H+WYKfOzt73+ZF3TqfoVZY=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:From;
	b=xiahXPipkrKlHXMS+CilbFpR9h2K1aC+TRPAIrVDFVqislcFSQCSiG6niIbhNOz/A
	 pHhGeaK9uEKPoKvzGr8NjV5wlmBsYREpzwUEtLjEWqdCwRz/8jDa7H401exGZ71tXy
	 /d3l462whBFZJkaUC2g+MdXpw4zeicxnT+4pw0u0=
From: "frankhb1989 at gmail dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/115514] New: Nonconforming
 reverse_iterator::operator->
Date: Sun, 16 Jun 2024 18:53:40 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: new
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 15.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: frankhb1989 at gmail dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status
 bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone
Message-ID: <bug-115514-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D115514

            Bug ID: 115514
           Summary: Nonconforming reverse_iterator::operator->
           Product: gcc
           Version: 15.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: libstdc++
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: frankhb1989 at gmail dot com
  Target Milestone: ---

The last comment in LWG 1052 says "the wording in [reverse.iter.elem] (of
P0896R4) for operator-> is equivalent to the PR for LWG 1052"; unfortunately
this is not true. The adopted wording in P0896R4 uses `prev` which returns a
prvalue for the call to `operator->`, while the PR uses an lvalue `tmp` for=
 the
call to `operator->`. Since `->` is no longer concerned in C++20's iterator
requirements, there can be observable differences when the iterator having
overloaded `operator->` with different ref-qualifiers in spite of the
equivalence to the expression formed by `operator*` (for lvalues).

The implementation in libc++ follows the standard wording literally. Actual=
ly
the original implementation (https://reviews.llvm.org/D120180) has an expli=
cit
`std::move`, suggesting the difference has been acknowledged. (Another
difference is it only applies the resolution for C++17 onward.)=