From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 8FC3A3858C32; Mon, 17 Jun 2024 21:18:34 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 8FC3A3858C32 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1718659114; bh=UVeeXXAEXYHQ2UyIpYbHVSOlPasEoowLf3/L46GKynI=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=sB+JX4LHF/YxUyuX4x+n4HTvEaV7IBRxgvYDfXRpSoVqh1YaIIrT2VE5i7eAN8M3A Lv3htnJiu0Fozelx79Eiyu9bIhqB2dDMIfU03rXMV5/jnKcsLikQdjELsNviWWdY2A 5wQpmW4eg4j4Y9Yp3o1HyjoTOS5+mM+DpHbrWzIA= From: "juergen.reuter at desy dot de" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug fortran/115528] [15 regression] segmentation fault in legacy F77 code Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 21:18:34 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: fortran X-Bugzilla-Version: 15.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: juergen.reuter at desy dot de X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 15.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D115528 --- Comment #2 from J=C3=BCrgen Reuter --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > what options are you using to compile the source? > Does it work at -O0? You are right: the problem doesn't appear for -O0. Our defaults are the lib= tool defaults of -g -O2.=