From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 6B6E93883013; Tue, 18 Jun 2024 23:08:57 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 6B6E93883013 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1718752137; bh=OxDxUhwtWbiCkQVNBbeF0krjhjoSc44r6oPxDwvJCew=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=X7Jhxc3pWamRmLV1Zf24o0lp0T7ZLWzU+9BPmGIcts8BJlq+fXVOw/WFDMo7JUgxm DvI1NIFst/mkaS6FVK9xYLBY3oGon9vPI/CZy6qIDPBAm7r5cS/o2MfbWJCY2o4ab9 aQNjv5nc3ovQMn3qqZtZU5pbrEjg6PWuRcgTu4T8= From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug testsuite/115545] [15 regression] missing/excess errors after r15-1394 Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 23:08:57 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: testsuite X-Bugzilla-Version: 15.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 15.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cf_reconfirmed_on bug_status everconfirmed Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D115545 Andrew Pinski changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Last reconfirmed| |2024-06-18 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- >enum H { x =3D 2UL + UINT_MAX }; /* { dg-error "outside the range= " } */ UL should most likely be ULL here. or require lp64 target. and yes this is just a testsuite issue. Because on ILP32 targets, `unsigned long` is the same as `unsigned int` so obvious they won't fail. NOTE there are also LLP64 targets where long is still the same size as int.=