public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/115546] New: [14.1.0 Regression] Section Type Conflict Error @ 2024-06-18 23:06 nikhilg1 at uci dot edu 2024-06-18 23:11 ` [Bug c++/115546] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ` (3 more replies) 0 siblings, 4 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: nikhilg1 at uci dot edu @ 2024-06-18 23:06 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115546 Bug ID: 115546 Summary: [14.1.0 Regression] Section Type Conflict Error Product: gcc Version: 14.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: nikhilg1 at uci dot edu Target Milestone: --- Consider the following reduced test case: $>cat test.cpp template <class T> int v2 __attribute__((section("A"))) = sizeof(T); template <> int v2<double> __attribute__((section("A"))) = 50; void a(int*& x) { x = &v2<int>; } $>g++-13 -c test.cpp && echo OK OK $>g++-14 -c test.cpp && echo OK test.cpp:2:5: error: 'v2<int>' causes a section type conflict with 'v2<double>' 2 | int v2 __attribute__((section("A"))) = sizeof(T); | ^~ test.cpp:5:5: note: 'v2<double>' was declared here 5 | int v2<double> __attribute__((section("A"))) = 50; | ^~~~~~~~~~ $>clang++-17 -c test.cpp && echo OK OK I am looking through the docs on the section attribute (https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-14.1.0/gcc/Common-Variable-Attributes.html) but am not able to see any reason why this case has started to fail. I also don't see any other compiler failing for this case. Issue is occurring since g++ 14.1.0 and seems to be reproducible on trunk as well. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/115546] [14.1.0 Regression] Section Type Conflict Error 2024-06-18 23:06 [Bug c++/115546] New: [14.1.0 Regression] Section Type Conflict Error nikhilg1 at uci dot edu @ 2024-06-18 23:11 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-06-18 23:13 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ` (2 subsequent siblings) 3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-06-18 23:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115546 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- the section attribute was ignored before GCC 14. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/115546] [14.1.0 Regression] Section Type Conflict Error 2024-06-18 23:06 [Bug c++/115546] New: [14.1.0 Regression] Section Type Conflict Error nikhilg1 at uci dot edu 2024-06-18 23:11 ` [Bug c++/115546] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-06-18 23:13 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-06-18 23:15 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-06-18 23:17 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-06-18 23:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115546 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- But starting with GCC 14, they are not ignored. In this case you have one variable that is in a comdat section named "A" and another one which is in a regular section named "A" which conflict. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/115546] [14.1.0 Regression] Section Type Conflict Error 2024-06-18 23:06 [Bug c++/115546] New: [14.1.0 Regression] Section Type Conflict Error nikhilg1 at uci dot edu 2024-06-18 23:11 ` [Bug c++/115546] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-06-18 23:13 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-06-18 23:15 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-06-18 23:17 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-06-18 23:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115546 Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- See Also| |https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill | |a/show_bug.cgi?id=87178 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- The reason why this is invalid is for the same reason why PR 87178 is invalid. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/115546] [14.1.0 Regression] Section Type Conflict Error 2024-06-18 23:06 [Bug c++/115546] New: [14.1.0 Regression] Section Type Conflict Error nikhilg1 at uci dot edu ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2024-06-18 23:15 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-06-18 23:17 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 3 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-06-18 23:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115546 Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- See PR 87178 on why this is invalid. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 87178 *** ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-06-18 23:17 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2024-06-18 23:06 [Bug c++/115546] New: [14.1.0 Regression] Section Type Conflict Error nikhilg1 at uci dot edu 2024-06-18 23:11 ` [Bug c++/115546] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-06-18 23:13 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-06-18 23:15 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-06-18 23:17 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).