From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id C1617388883F; Thu, 20 Jun 2024 07:58:29 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org C1617388883F
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1718870309;
	bh=pCSUU6mpsfA/h2YOldVIMTseNo4+McFaguue2PSwWEM=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=OVv9QU9c28OZPgGuQBXyi7nidnvaVHnE7eqFDdexVGF702tvIdod72HJE3+jJyaIw
	 lWkT+c3T8AmsBZuFDaHMWaBbB93Wyo6VUGFYpk28ed7hsqK8GXNJ/W/GZ9bpJDrSNI
	 GKuoO1AztMeMVpeQBWsZLP18PzrPoaRFW4wYI4Gk=
From: "burnus at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug middle-end/115551] [missed optimization] "c1 << (a + c2)" not
 optimized into "(c1 << c2) << a"
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2024 07:58:29 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: middle-end
X-Bugzilla-Version: 15.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-115551-4-KErux8NkHI@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-115551-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-115551-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D115551

--- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus <burnus at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Crossref: New Bug 115555 is for the range analysis to deduce from 'x << a' =
that
'a' must be nonnegative.=