From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id BE2513858D35; Mon, 24 Jun 2024 17:08:43 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org BE2513858D35
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1719248923;
	bh=fA2FlxgtQ8oLxumhlp7hJ+2YCWipnRemLt/QyoZa+bM=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=PoPm/eAN3fEx0qcuAXPuexAAfM3HOAWUaedOQzqkfC2sfheO5f5Cwwhx8sXEVAvNY
	 KeoyoIP5K6GfLG6CNMVwcXDCUzGrlX5loBa08wlWNGsUh6xMIzt2nmG7QKQxbXM407
	 BqMfRvVc6n2U1T3v/iknaP5r4LuV1vLwj55Tg+TM=
From: "mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug c++/115558] Trivial noexcept(false) default constructor does
 not make value initialization potentially throwing
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 17:08:43 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: c++
X-Bugzilla-Version: 15.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: wrong-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-115558-4-9rF9f5JrQH@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-115558-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-115558-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D115558

Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek <mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Probably mine then; thanks for the report.=