public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org> To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug middle-end/115597] [15 Regression] vectorizer takes 20+ h compiling 510.parest in SPECCPU2017 since g:46bb4ce4d30ab749d40f6f4cef6f1fb7c7813452 Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2024 11:00:08 +0000 [thread overview] Message-ID: <bug-115597-4-7nKMZq2Pl6@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw) In-Reply-To: <bug-115597-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115597 --- Comment #4 from Tamar Christina <tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org> --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2) > Ah, I feared this would happen - this case seems to be because of a lot of > VEC_PERM nodes(?) which are not handled by the CSE process as well as the > two-operator nodes which lack SLP_TREE_SCALAR_STMTS (we'd need NULL elements > there, something I need to add anyway). > > The bst_map deals as "visited" map, but nodes not handled there would need > a "visited" set (but as said above, the plan is to reduce that set to zero). > Ah I see, that makes sense. > I'll see to reproduce to confirm. Usually a two-operator node shouldn't > be too bad since the next non-two-operator one will serve as 'visited' point > but in this graph we have several adjacent two-operator nodes without any > intermediate node handled by the bst-map processing code. I can't reproduce > with -Ofast -march=znver2 though. > Yeah I forgot to mention I could only reproduce it with LTO and a recent glibc. Thanks for the fix!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-23 11:00 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2024-06-23 8:24 [Bug middle-end/115597] New: " tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-06-23 8:49 ` [Bug middle-end/115597] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-06-23 9:29 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-06-23 10:29 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-06-23 11:00 ` tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org [this message] 2024-06-23 12:18 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-06-23 12:19 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=bug-115597-4-7nKMZq2Pl6@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \ --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \ --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: linkBe sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).