From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 8C1BE387086B; Tue, 25 Jun 2024 19:36:04 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 8C1BE387086B DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1719344164; bh=JSaMhnaU3NPisR+QXD4h2fLLm5QFBGY/r+lXwB5abWg=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=gkzWX/bI/B0DhzA/Tyu6c5bkBWSLwbiRuiPc+C83onnHygR/lC0+od3KENHXQ/W50 QMFpMhjaxNzbcYCS0V7jXbrMvGbQjA5qO8D5AsC+tPIxgSd7CZFBGm3sJVrcgevun5 nzPT9Isff5fCq+QGiJBgKDtA/X0ackavRd52iFMo= From: "Evgeny.Karpov at microsoft dot com" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug target/115643] aarch64-w64-mingw32 support today breaks x86_64-w64-mingw32 build cannot represent relocation type BFD_RELOC_64 Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 19:36:04 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: target X-Bugzilla-Version: 15.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: Evgeny.Karpov at microsoft dot com X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D115643 --- Comment #2 from Evgeny Karpov --- Thanks for reporting the issue. The patch series has been tested, and regression tests have been executed f= or x86_64-w64-mingw32. Could you please provide more details on which patch triggers the regression?=20 It looks more like binutils changes.=