public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "sjames at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug target/115673] New: [15 regression] gcc.target/i386/force-indirect-call-2.c test failure
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2024 04:48:21 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-115673-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/> (raw)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115673

            Bug ID: 115673
           Summary: [15 regression]
                    gcc.target/i386/force-indirect-call-2.c test failure
           Product: gcc
           Version: unknown
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Keywords: testsuite-fail
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: target
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
                CC: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
  Target Milestone: ---

I had these differences when upgrading earlier (with a patched gcc for
PR115661):
```
--- a/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/15/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.xfail
+++ b/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/15/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.xfail
@@ -438,6 +438,7 @@ FAIL: gcc.dg/nested-vla-1.c (test for excess errors)
 FAIL: gcc.dg/nested-vla-2.c (test for excess errors)
 FAIL: gcc.dg/nested-vla-3.c (test for excess errors)
 FAIL: gcc.dg/packed-vla.c (test for excess errors)
+FAIL: gcc.dg/pr10474.c scan-rtl-dump pro_and_epilogue "Performing
shrink-wrapping"
 FAIL: gcc.dg/pr30473.c (test for excess errors)
 FAIL: gcc.dg/pr34457-1.c (test for excess errors)
 FAIL: gcc.dg/pr38902.c (test for excess errors)
@@ -794,6 +795,7 @@ Running gcc:/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/i386.exp ...
 FAIL: gcc.target/i386/cet-sjlj-3.c scan-assembler-times call\t_?longjmp 1
 FAIL: gcc.target/i386/cet-sjlj-5.c scan-assembler-times call\t_?longjmp 1
 FAIL: gcc.target/i386/fentryname3.c scan-assembler call\t\\*nop@GOTPCREL
+FAIL: gcc.target/i386/force-indirect-call-2.c scan-assembler-times
(?:call|jmp)[ \\t]+\\*% 3
 FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr101716.c scan-assembler leal[\\t ][^\\n]*eax
 FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr101716.c scan-assembler-not movl[\\t ][^\\n]*eax
 FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr101950-2.c scan-assembler-times \txor[ql]\t 2
@@ -802,6 +804,8 @@ UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/i386/pr113689-1.c compilation failed
to produce executabl
 FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr85044.c (test for excess errors)
 FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr86722.c scan-assembler-not orpd
 FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr86722.c scan-assembler-times
(?n)(?:andnpd|andpd|blendvpd) 1
+FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr91384.c scan-assembler-not testl
+FAIL: gcc.target/i386/stack-check-17.c scan-assembler-not pop
                === gfortran tests ===
```

Picking on force-indirect-call-2.c:
```
Executing on host: /tmp/build/gcc/xgcc -B/tmp/build/gcc/ 
/home/sam/git/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/force-indirect-call-2.c   
-fdiagnostics-plain-output  -O2 -mforce-indirect-call -fPIC -ffat-lto-objects
-fno-ident -S -o force-indirect-call-2.s    (timeout = 300)
spawn -ignore SIGHUP /tmp/build/gcc/xgcc -B/tmp/build/gcc/
/home/sam/git/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/force-indirect-call-2.c
-fdiagnostics-plain-output -O2 -mforce-indirect-call -fPIC -ffat-lto-objects
-fno-ident -S -o force-indirect-call-2
gcc.target/i386/force-indirect-call-2.c: (?:call|jmp)[ \\t]+\\*% found 1 times
FAIL: gcc.target/i386/force-indirect-call-2.c scan-assembler-times
(?:call|jmp)[ \\t]+\\*% 3
```

I assume r15-1662-g629257bcb81434?

             reply	other threads:[~2024-06-27  4:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-27  4:48 sjames at gcc dot gnu.org [this message]
2024-06-27  4:50 ` [Bug target/115673] " sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-06-27  4:50 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/115673] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-06-27  5:59 ` [Bug target/115673] " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-06-27  6:02 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-06-28 15:23 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-06-30  9:53 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-06-30 16:42 ` ubizjak at gmail dot com

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-115673-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ \
    --to=gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).