From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 88A2D386547E; Sun, 30 Jun 2024 16:44:39 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 88A2D386547E
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1719765879;
	bh=GtsFZSDqJwDN1Up+/4lK7Q3GJZnAJaO126Hi4o5LMuE=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=ttd6uNShy5rizW9RDFzzrhhO9F05bIzEUptqLj8QnQ64z9AWuKgqBROn6eKv0enpJ
	 8TefFt1iFTHyv1TqZHLVEFdgYT3pfLIiy5qyvsWzJJNcxyzXfzYfeczGTzryOTXgQw
	 XxpN+QoM/l9dFJGx8TnckxHg+CpSqmr8uFF+2jlg=
From: "pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/115693] 8 std::byte std::array comparison
 potential missed optimization
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2024 16:44:39 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 14.1.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-115693-4-dguccOaI37@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-115693-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-115693-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D115693

--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Paulous Haile from comment #4)
> Maybe not necessary, just wanted to add a case for the default operator=
=3D=3D. I
> have noticed it also doesn't seem to coalesce adjacent cmps, which I assu=
me
> is part of the same issue.

That is PR 108953 already.=