public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug c++/115806] New: No error for enum redefinition in template @ 2024-07-06 14:10 nshead at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-07-06 15:08 ` [Bug c++/115806] [11/12/13/14/15 Regression] No error for member enum redefinition in class template (even after instantiation) pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ` (6 more replies) 0 siblings, 7 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: nshead at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-07-06 14:10 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115806 Bug ID: 115806 Summary: No error for enum redefinition in template Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: nshead at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- The following code currently compiles with no error: template <typename T> struct S { enum E { a }; enum E { b }; }; S<int> s; The same code without S being a template correctly errors with: <source>:3:10: error: multiple definition of 'enum S::E' 3 | enum E {b}; | ^ <source>:2:10: note: previous definition here 2 | enum E {a}; | ^ ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/115806] [11/12/13/14/15 Regression] No error for member enum redefinition in class template (even after instantiation) 2024-07-06 14:10 [Bug c++/115806] New: No error for enum redefinition in template nshead at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-07-06 15:08 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-07-07 18:48 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org ` (5 subsequent siblings) 6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-07-06 15:08 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115806 Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed| |2024-07-06 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Confirmed. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/115806] [11/12/13/14/15 Regression] No error for member enum redefinition in class template (even after instantiation) 2024-07-06 14:10 [Bug c++/115806] New: No error for enum redefinition in template nshead at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-07-06 15:08 ` [Bug c++/115806] [11/12/13/14/15 Regression] No error for member enum redefinition in class template (even after instantiation) pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-07-07 18:48 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-07-19 13:26 ` [Bug c++/115806] [12/13/14/15 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org ` (4 subsequent siblings) 6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-07-07 18:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115806 Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|--- |11.5 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/115806] [12/13/14/15 Regression] No error for member enum redefinition in class template (even after instantiation) 2024-07-06 14:10 [Bug c++/115806] New: No error for enum redefinition in template nshead at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-07-06 15:08 ` [Bug c++/115806] [11/12/13/14/15 Regression] No error for member enum redefinition in class template (even after instantiation) pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-07-07 18:48 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-07-19 13:26 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-08-08 14:03 ` simartin at gcc dot gnu.org ` (3 subsequent siblings) 6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-07-19 13:26 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115806 Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Target Milestone|11.5 |12.5 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> --- GCC 11 branch is being closed. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/115806] [12/13/14/15 Regression] No error for member enum redefinition in class template (even after instantiation) 2024-07-06 14:10 [Bug c++/115806] New: No error for enum redefinition in template nshead at gcc dot gnu.org ` (2 preceding siblings ...) 2024-07-19 13:26 ` [Bug c++/115806] [12/13/14/15 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-08-08 14:03 ` simartin at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-08-08 14:48 ` simartin at gcc dot gnu.org ` (2 subsequent siblings) 6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: simartin at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-08-08 14:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115806 Simon Martin <simartin at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |simartin at gcc dot gnu.org Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #3 from Simon Martin <simartin at gcc dot gnu.org> --- I'm working on this one. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/115806] [12/13/14/15 Regression] No error for member enum redefinition in class template (even after instantiation) 2024-07-06 14:10 [Bug c++/115806] New: No error for enum redefinition in template nshead at gcc dot gnu.org ` (3 preceding siblings ...) 2024-08-08 14:03 ` simartin at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-08-08 14:48 ` simartin at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-08-09 15:16 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-08-09 15:18 ` simartin at gcc dot gnu.org 6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: simartin at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-08-08 14:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115806 --- Comment #4 from Simon Martin <simartin at gcc dot gnu.org> --- This started to fail with https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commitdiff;h=557831a91df947b447fc9fd94ecad02470a3c86a ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/115806] [12/13/14/15 Regression] No error for member enum redefinition in class template (even after instantiation) 2024-07-06 14:10 [Bug c++/115806] New: No error for enum redefinition in template nshead at gcc dot gnu.org ` (4 preceding siblings ...) 2024-08-08 14:48 ` simartin at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-08-09 15:16 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-08-09 15:18 ` simartin at gcc dot gnu.org 6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-08-09 15:16 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115806 --- Comment #5 from GCC Commits <cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org> --- The master branch has been updated by Simon Martin <simartin@gcc.gnu.org>: https://gcc.gnu.org/g:786ebbd6058540b2110da16a693f0c582c11413c commit r15-2855-g786ebbd6058540b2110da16a693f0c582c11413c Author: Simon Martin <simon@nasilyan.com> Date: Thu Aug 8 14:59:49 2024 +0200 c++: Don't accept multiple enum definitions within template class [PR115806] We have been accepting the following invalid code since revision 557831a91df === cut here === template <typename T> struct S { enum E { a }; enum E { b }; }; S<int> s; === cut here === The problem is that start_enum will set OPAQUE_ENUM_P to true even if it retrieves an existing definition for the enum, which causes the redefinition check in cp_parser_enum_specifier to be bypassed. This patch only sets OPAQUE_ENUM_P and ENUM_FIXED_UNDERLYING_TYPE_P when actually pushing a new tag for the enum. PR c++/115806 gcc/cp/ChangeLog: * decl.cc (start_enum): Only set OPAQUE_ENUM_P and ENUM_FIXED_UNDERLYING_TYPE_P when pushing a new tag. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * g++.dg/parse/enum15.C: New test. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [Bug c++/115806] [12/13/14/15 Regression] No error for member enum redefinition in class template (even after instantiation) 2024-07-06 14:10 [Bug c++/115806] New: No error for enum redefinition in template nshead at gcc dot gnu.org ` (5 preceding siblings ...) 2024-08-09 15:16 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-08-09 15:18 ` simartin at gcc dot gnu.org 6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread From: simartin at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-08-09 15:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: gcc-bugs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115806 Simon Martin <simartin at gcc dot gnu.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|12.5 |15.0 --- Comment #6 from Simon Martin <simartin at gcc dot gnu.org> --- Fixed in trunk. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-08-09 15:18 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2024-07-06 14:10 [Bug c++/115806] New: No error for enum redefinition in template nshead at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-07-06 15:08 ` [Bug c++/115806] [11/12/13/14/15 Regression] No error for member enum redefinition in class template (even after instantiation) pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-07-07 18:48 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-07-19 13:26 ` [Bug c++/115806] [12/13/14/15 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-08-08 14:03 ` simartin at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-08-08 14:48 ` simartin at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-08-09 15:16 ` cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2024-08-09 15:18 ` simartin at gcc dot gnu.org
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).