From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id E4E41385E457; Sun, 21 Jul 2024 15:01:05 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org E4E41385E457
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1721574065;
	bh=NwrLNdVyfhpsimyQaCFCdWPVrtg6+HqQuu1rPjkK3fU=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=WA1DwH4As3ksHs0/r/KFner07x1ZKSiTXx6AFeLcJuAYxG8hbrAM7+6omvlaMv1Yd
	 CNMQT0aTIBkJ/5Ur7IoVNQDe/fUuRKl+TVxYq/1y+DPnOIVX7iye75XILkvngX4MHA
	 k3e3Gn02j1TS8qOTlsLsZcuoWc2nxgSqYsM7KAx4=
From: "arsen at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/115907] Libstdc++ and GCC itself should avoid glibc
 above 2.34 dependency
Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2024 15:01:05 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: arsen at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: RESOLVED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: INVALID
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-115907-4-3jHRKBls1y@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-115907-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-115907-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D115907

--- Comment #48 from Arsen Arsenovi=C4=87 <arsen at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
Please stop resetting the bug status.  You create unneeded churn.  This bug=
 is
invalid.

(In reply to cqwrteur from comment #43)
> This is completely BS. Old libc cannot build with the latest gcc since the
> script messed up. People end up stuck with old versions of C++ standards,
> which is unacceptable. If GNU folks continue f things up, I can guarantee
> you everyone will move to LLVM
Fix the build script then, rather than breaking the compiler.

(In reply to cqwrteur from comment #44)
> https://github.com/trcrsired/glibc/commit/
> 4a724a45761fe27000247267d6ea02cb64b17b3c#diff-
> e1c081599cb4df1d7224ee161959d04457b256c4b269e428baec5a6d34e630d1
>=20
> My patch just works perfectly. Don't know what's your opposition. I am not
> even suggest an ABI lock down or something
"WFM" is a dangerous and broken mindset that cannot be applied here.  The p=
atch
above is a nonsense hack in the libc.=