From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 7E3723858C60; Sat, 13 Jul 2024 13:19:20 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 7E3723858C60
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1720876760;
	bh=R6RyxevztjpdjV5vA+sFcpsTwIt2r7VwcO+jdyunsjk=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=Dox2EIbecwjIRN8NvtXxkFZGFMqLW9AdhpPvtcskQqDGw8O4j9wpA8yN6OsrEkd/F
	 AcKl6v9A3tW4zlIEBVG1ZYlFQmyrwzYCgqTLNQNpCmI4+eIg+jlrj/1X5+c3+jdmpa
	 3jHYXiHpVlKIGTOm7NJQWn2kxqV4lbjP5pr+oLAA=
From: "unlvsur at live dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/115907] Libstdc++ and GCC itself should avoid glibc
 above 2.34 dependency
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2024 13:19:20 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: unlvsur at live dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: resolution bug_status
Message-ID: <bug-115907-4-5WoI7KrsOz@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-115907-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-115907-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D115907

cqwrteur <unlvsur at live dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|WONTFIX                     |---
             Status|RESOLVED                    |UNCONFIRMED

--- Comment #21 from cqwrteur <unlvsur at live dot com> ---
(In reply to Arsen Arsenovi=C4=87 from comment #20)
> (In reply to cqwrteur from comment #17)
> > Then why? Why does it define _ISOC2X_SOURCE? C++ is not even C.
>=20
> "it"?  presuming you mean glibc, because _GNU_SOURCES enables all feature=
s,
> including the C2X specific ones.
>=20
> note that not enabling those would not fix downgrading being broken.

Then why is it not the case for C++98 or C18?=