From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 9B6AD385DC20; Sat, 13 Jul 2024 13:06:44 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 9B6AD385DC20
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1720876004;
	bh=Eot+3zpVCjMt162T+yuFVVBtI69eyMT3YXFh3XQnPmM=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=NkTDgxF+8LNmY88A+r/G1Dc3lPXlGvc+oXBBs+i9QYqp+LweeYgBLOb1v/x8W4ufX
	 yQPnrSVTEskKOBn6CXtv2E68e02ya/ZZ2ytMd8QkobL/GHcgjg4ILSEvHDoOHyyP5t
	 vekjHUhlbtDdUrl2mrF7JWcJ+zhLHu7abOHw4cE4=
From: "unlvsur at live dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/115907] Libstdc++ and GCC itself should avoid glibc
 above 2.34 dependency
Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2024 13:06:44 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: unlvsur at live dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-115907-4-Uiu6ixck7Z@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-115907-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-115907-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D115907

--- Comment #11 from cqwrteur <unlvsur at live dot com> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #6)
> There is NO fix inside gcc/libstdc++.
> THe only fix is your build of GCC (which includes the target libraries)
> needs to be build against the oldest version of glibc you support. This is
> something which GCC cannot control.
> THIS IS HOW linking and backwards compatibility works.

Try to create a gcc cross compiler 15 for glibc 2.25 for me. You cannot eve=
n do
that. So what's the excuse?=