From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 90EB6385840B; Sun, 21 Jul 2024 15:16:13 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 90EB6385840B
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1721574973;
	bh=DJ35mciON6KIvc6fKvW4Kbtr7SyiaB+7vQWByBgpCic=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=HOydn8Yp+nco+TMutA0zlyIc586G+h8G/8YvQqIGVrzqr8BIElkQM8k3zHNhQIRKs
	 17i3gZrX/0syWI8B+apDNyv7kaBCqaZ/83XDxme9MnLwsjYGD35j3LOaHcJNV1457B
	 Cu5wnbPgPl9OBnLfAGmbCzKZfjoI9oisQFeggjz8=
From: "unlvsur at live dot com" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug libstdc++/115907] Libstdc++ and GCC itself should avoid glibc
 above 2.34 dependency
Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2024 15:16:10 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: libstdc++
X-Bugzilla-Version: unknown
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: unlvsur at live dot com
X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-115907-4-fO2POtEsGt@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-115907-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-115907-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D115907

--- Comment #52 from cqwrteur <unlvsur at live dot com> ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #47)
> Apple provides different sysroots for each (major) version of their OS to
> solve this issue. This is NOT a GCC issue nor this is a glibc issue. You =
can
> buld gcc against majority of old sysroot just fine. I have built against =
the
> trunk of gcc against a centos 6 sysroot before (actually I have built on =
the
> trunk after it started to require C++11 on a centos 6 machine too).

Apple? No wonder why apple bs cannot take over windows because only Microso=
ft
does this right=