From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48)
	id 126EB3861039; Fri, 23 Aug 2024 12:07:04 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 126EB3861039
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org;
	s=default; t=1724414824;
	bh=E7NMlga8mFN6px3pNGicArF9T6NXu8Gx3epC1Ww4wkk=;
	h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From;
	b=pRS7XNQBQ053F/IeoxQyECzEsxI3pc9RPbP5kFP6bt7qfJ8y/OIF8WZw2CBolm4wx
	 Vvmj5tYRHP6D8i9M9AAdpAzYj31T027JAkfflJ03JwIJHpwwHpCm4N7nLLwgS/+NmL
	 k1qnlcCROqLDQeUnG1bwaq3FWUUFl62uIk4o/35s=
From: "rguenther at suse dot de" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/116348] [15 regression] ICE when building
 gavl-1.4.0 with -O3 -march=znver4 since r15-2791-g2083389a18d366
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2024 12:07:03 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: 15.0
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal
X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenther at suse dot de
X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 15.0
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-116348-4-drv2yA2Wsc@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-116348-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-116348-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.sourceware.org>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D116348

--- Comment #11 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> ---
On Thu, 22 Aug 2024, xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:

> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D116348
>=20
> --- Comment #10 from Xi Ruoyao <xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> I've tested the change and it fixes PR116314 case as well.
>=20
> Richard: do you want me to send your change as a patch like before (the
> PR116142 fix)?

Yes pleae.=