From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 97B9F3858406; Thu, 12 Sep 2024 07:18:45 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 97B9F3858406 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1726125529; bh=BvZPNeQNF6tNmLwflUs9xYdcuN4kimyNrGQXk6JYI98=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=xE0iIXIeDNoJ5R3VlZisM0nBVCNd/M60Hj3imz3b4J3U0+H1XwsxW8M8WiMIMX/l3 OcywbtekT4cadhT6G6QFWwFg6U/n1DakprxC98JeWWtUGn0K/VmZNJI2XnF+9wUBrs icw7HQc1dFcAk2skfK/mXuW/mR+8DRaAu6H6XQHo= From: "rguenther at suse dot de" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/116352] [15 regression] ICE when building opencv-4.9.0 (error: definition in block 208 does not dominate use in block 188) since r15-2820-gab18785840d7b8 Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2024 07:18:43 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 15.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: ice-on-valid-code, needs-bisection X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenther at suse dot de X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: 15.0 X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D116352 --- Comment #14 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 11 Sep 2024, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D116352 >=20 > Andrew Pinski changed: >=20 > What |Removed |Added > -------------------------------------------------------------------------= --- > Keywords| |needs-bisection >=20 > --- Comment #13 from Andrew Pinski --- > (In reply to Konstantinos Eleftheriou from comment #12) > > How can I reproduce this on aarch64? I tried using the code in comment = 3, > > using `-O3 -fno-vect-cost-model` with SVE disabled as Andrew mentioned = and > > GCC on commit 7a970bd03f1d8eed7703db8a8db3c753ea68899f, but couldn't ma= nage > > to reproduce it. >=20 > Looks like it was fixed ... I don't think so but it might have become latent.=