public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug target/116576] New: `INT64_MAX` and `-Oz`
@ 2024-09-03  6:14 lh_mouse at 126 dot com
  2024-09-03  6:20 ` [Bug target/116576] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: lh_mouse at 126 dot com @ 2024-09-03  6:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116576

            Bug ID: 116576
           Summary: `INT64_MAX` and `-Oz`
           Product: gcc
           Version: 15.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: target
          Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
          Reporter: lh_mouse at 126 dot com
  Target Milestone: ---

For this simple function:

   ```
   int64_t make_value(void) { return INT64_MAX; }
   ```

Both GCC and Clang generate an 8-byte `movabs` which adds up to 10 bytes:

   ```
   48 b8 ffffffffffffff7f    ; mov rax, 0x7fffffffffffffff
                             ; (10 bytes; no dependency)
   ```

When we do `-Oz` we otpimize for size and do not care about the false
dependency, and this can be accomplished in only 7 bytes:

   ```
   48 83 c8 ff               ; or rax, -1
   48 d1 e8                  ; shr rax
                             ; (7 bytes; input dependency on rax)
   ```

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/116576] `INT64_MAX` and `-Oz`
  2024-09-03  6:14 [Bug target/116576] New: `INT64_MAX` and `-Oz` lh_mouse at 126 dot com
@ 2024-09-03  6:20 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  2024-09-03  6:51 ` lh_mouse at 126 dot com
  2024-09-09  7:55 ` roger at nextmovesoftware dot com
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-09-03  6:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116576

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Severity|normal                      |enhancement

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/116576] `INT64_MAX` and `-Oz`
  2024-09-03  6:14 [Bug target/116576] New: `INT64_MAX` and `-Oz` lh_mouse at 126 dot com
  2024-09-03  6:20 ` [Bug target/116576] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-09-03  6:51 ` lh_mouse at 126 dot com
  2024-09-09  7:55 ` roger at nextmovesoftware dot com
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: lh_mouse at 126 dot com @ 2024-09-03  6:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116576

--- Comment #1 from LIU Hao <lh_mouse at 126 dot com> ---
Here is a longer solution but it breaks the dependency:

   ```
   31c0            ; xor eax, eax
   48 ffc8         ; dec rax
   48 d1e8         ; shr rax
                   ; (8 bytes; no dependency)
   ```

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [Bug target/116576] `INT64_MAX` and `-Oz`
  2024-09-03  6:14 [Bug target/116576] New: `INT64_MAX` and `-Oz` lh_mouse at 126 dot com
  2024-09-03  6:20 ` [Bug target/116576] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  2024-09-03  6:51 ` lh_mouse at 126 dot com
@ 2024-09-09  7:55 ` roger at nextmovesoftware dot com
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: roger at nextmovesoftware dot com @ 2024-09-09  7:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116576

Roger Sayle <roger at nextmovesoftware dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
                 CC|                            |roger at nextmovesoftware dot com
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2024-09-09

--- Comment #2 from Roger Sayle <roger at nextmovesoftware dot com> ---
The constant ~0 can be materialized on x86 in only three bytes using either of
the sequences "push -1; pop rax" (i.e. 6a ff 58) or "stc; sbb ax,ax" (i.e. f9
19 c0), both of which could theoretically be fused/optimized/avoid dependencies
on modern hardware.  With -Oz, GCC mainline and clang currently use the first
sequence.

But you're absolutely right that following this by a logical shift can be used
to materialize INT64_MAX (and other constants) in fewer bytes than the standard
movabs when its safe to clobber the flags.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2024-09-09  7:55 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-09-03  6:14 [Bug target/116576] New: `INT64_MAX` and `-Oz` lh_mouse at 126 dot com
2024-09-03  6:20 ` [Bug target/116576] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-09-03  6:51 ` lh_mouse at 126 dot com
2024-09-09  7:55 ` roger at nextmovesoftware dot com

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).