From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by sourceware.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 45F503860C34; Thu, 5 Sep 2024 08:42:26 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 sourceware.org 45F503860C34 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gcc.gnu.org; s=default; t=1725525746; bh=+MTdX+AoxyrL5dHSGfBzHCXyETQC0+ByvoyZxxnmuDM=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:From; b=fMT8B1OwgE6cc1QelhNH6iOu/vBTRV67Uq8i7Uo3ZdSQRc1IgL4tmLKT03YD2Aiuj 4suVKEQyX5Xf5CAAt1kGbBvVQxzvGusXviuaTGIatssU2tlwtNKIO/K+WtFnxd2/vS j2OR7S+2ttLs/NIXaED4l91lkEUMkXY2f/JmRcCI= From: "rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/116609] New: Live lane vectorization does not support SLP with loop masking Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2024 08:42:21 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: new X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization X-Bugzilla-Version: 15.0 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: UNCONFIRMED X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_id short_desc product version bug_status bug_severity priority component assigned_to reporter target_milestone Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 List-Id: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D116609 Bug ID: 116609 Summary: Live lane vectorization does not support SLP with loop masking Product: gcc Version: 15.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- It should be trivial to support for single-lane SLP (testing a patch for th= at) but also multi-lane might be supportable, for example using slide up/down or easier when the number of lanes is power-of-two use a larger element lastb extract. In general when SLP discovery gets us multi-lanes and that fails we current= ly scrap the respective SLP instance but we might want to split it up to a set of single-lane instances (also avoiding re-discovery).=