* [Bug rtl-optimization/116774] ICE bootstrapping on cfarm92 (a riscv64 machine)
2024-09-19 4:21 [Bug target/116774] New: ICE bootstrapping on cfarm92 (a riscv64 machine) egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-09-19 4:24 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-09-19 4:33 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-09-19 4:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116774
Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Component|target |rtl-optimization
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Keywords| |ice-on-valid-code
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed| |2024-09-19
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
> See <file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-11/README.Bugs> for instructions.
This is with the host compiler so this might not be something which we could
help with.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/116774] ICE bootstrapping on cfarm92 (a riscv64 machine)
2024-09-19 4:21 [Bug target/116774] New: ICE bootstrapping on cfarm92 (a riscv64 machine) egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-09-19 4:24 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/116774] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-09-19 4:33 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-09-19 4:34 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: egallager at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-09-19 4:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116774
--- Comment #2 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
well, I mean, it *ought* to be possible to bootstrap with GCC 11 as the host
compiler, right? The "transition to C++14" thread on the mailing lists was just
talking about raising the requirement for the host compiler to GCC 5, which is
still significantly older than GCC 11...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/116774] ICE bootstrapping on cfarm92 (a riscv64 machine)
2024-09-19 4:21 [Bug target/116774] New: ICE bootstrapping on cfarm92 (a riscv64 machine) egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-09-19 4:24 ` [Bug rtl-optimization/116774] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-09-19 4:33 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-09-19 4:34 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-09-19 4:35 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: sjames at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-09-19 4:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116774
Sam James <sjames at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Sam James <sjames at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The problem is that it's riscv (so 11 is prehistoric in that context) and it's
also a huge generated file.
tbh, I suspect if you re-run the failing command, it might even succeed. The
riscv boards often aren't very stable..
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/116774] ICE bootstrapping on cfarm92 (a riscv64 machine)
2024-09-19 4:21 [Bug target/116774] New: ICE bootstrapping on cfarm92 (a riscv64 machine) egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2024-09-19 4:34 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-09-19 4:35 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-09-19 4:41 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: sjames at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-09-19 4:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116774
--- Comment #4 from Sam James <sjames at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The difference is "code we might massage to make it compile" vs "no idea why
the host compiler is ICEing", i.e. language support vs bugginess.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/116774] ICE bootstrapping on cfarm92 (a riscv64 machine)
2024-09-19 4:21 [Bug target/116774] New: ICE bootstrapping on cfarm92 (a riscv64 machine) egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2024-09-19 4:35 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-09-19 4:41 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-09-19 4:43 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: egallager at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-09-19 4:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116774
--- Comment #5 from Eric Gallager <egallager at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #3)
> The problem is that it's riscv (so 11 is prehistoric in that context) and
> it's also a huge generated file.
>
> tbh, I suspect if you re-run the failing command, it might even succeed. The
> riscv boards often aren't very stable..
Hm, indeed, I'm trying it without the `-j2` this time, and it seems to be
getting past that spot... maybe it was hitting some sort of resource limit due
to the parallelism?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/116774] ICE bootstrapping on cfarm92 (a riscv64 machine)
2024-09-19 4:21 [Bug target/116774] New: ICE bootstrapping on cfarm92 (a riscv64 machine) egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2024-09-19 4:41 ` egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-09-19 4:43 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-09-19 8:48 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: sjames at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-09-19 4:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116774
--- Comment #6 from Sam James <sjames at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
If I had to bet, it's overheating.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/116774] ICE bootstrapping on cfarm92 (a riscv64 machine)
2024-09-19 4:21 [Bug target/116774] New: ICE bootstrapping on cfarm92 (a riscv64 machine) egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2024-09-19 4:43 ` sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-09-19 8:48 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-09-19 13:03 ` xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-09-19 18:50 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-09-19 8:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116774
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |INVALID
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
According to comment#5
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/116774] ICE bootstrapping on cfarm92 (a riscv64 machine)
2024-09-19 4:21 [Bug target/116774] New: ICE bootstrapping on cfarm92 (a riscv64 machine) egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2024-09-19 8:48 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-09-19 13:03 ` xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org
2024-09-19 18:50 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2024-09-19 13:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116774
Xi Ruoyao <xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org
URL| |https://www.bitwizard.nl/si
| |g11/
--- Comment #8 from Xi Ruoyao <xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
For any "segmentation fault" it's better to rule out hardware issues before
making a bug report.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread
* [Bug rtl-optimization/116774] ICE bootstrapping on cfarm92 (a riscv64 machine)
2024-09-19 4:21 [Bug target/116774] New: ICE bootstrapping on cfarm92 (a riscv64 machine) egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2024-09-19 13:03 ` xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2024-09-19 18:50 ` schwab@linux-m68k.org
8 siblings, 0 replies; 10+ messages in thread
From: schwab@linux-m68k.org @ 2024-09-19 18:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116774
--- Comment #9 from Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org> ---
The Unmatched has a temperature sensor that can be watched with sensors.
$ sensors
nvme-pci-0600
Adapter: PCI adapter
Composite: +36.9°C (low = -5.2°C, high = +79.8°C)
(crit = +84.8°C)
tmp451-i2c-0-4c
Adapter: i2c-ocores
temp1: +40.6°C (low = +0.0°C, high = +85.0°C)
(crit = +85.0°C, hyst = +75.0°C)
temp2: +43.1°C (low = +0.0°C, high = +85.0°C)
(crit = +108.0°C, hyst = +98.0°C)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 10+ messages in thread