From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12499 invoked by alias); 8 Jun 2011 21:24:06 -0000 Received: (qmail 12489 invoked by uid 22791); 8 Jun 2011 21:24:05 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from localhost (HELO gcc.gnu.org) (127.0.0.1) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 08 Jun 2011 21:23:52 +0000 From: "jason at gcc dot gnu.org" To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org Subject: [Bug c++/12255] exception-specification ignored on pointer to function X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc X-Bugzilla-Component: c++ X-Bugzilla-Keywords: accepts-invalid X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: jason at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Priority: P3 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: CC Summary Severity Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2011 21:24:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org X-SW-Source: 2011-06/txt/msg00676.txt.bz2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12255 Jason Merrill changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jason at gcc dot gnu.org Summary|exception-specifications |exception-specification |unchecked during assignment |ignored on pointer to |of pointer to function |function Severity|enhancement |normal --- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill 2011-06-08 21:22:30 UTC --- The underlying issue is that G++ just ignores exception-specifications on non-function declarations. I think this choice originated in the uncertainty about whether or not the exeception-specification would become part of a function type rather than remain associated with the declaration. And as it happens, DR 92 (http://www.open-std.org/JTC1/SC22/WG21/docs/cwg_active.html#92) is still open...