public inbox for gcc-bugs@sourceware.org
help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [Bug debug/12869] Bad stabs for bitsize fields
       [not found] <bug-12869-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2022-12-01  1:27 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-12-01  1:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12869

Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Resolution|---                         |WONTFIX
   Target Milestone|---                         |13.0
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED

--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski <pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
stabs support was removed:
r13-2361-g7e0db0cdf01e9c

So won't fix.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug debug/12869] Bad stabs for bitsize fields
  2003-11-01 11:05 [Bug debug/12869] New: " gcc at microbizz dot nl
                   ` (5 preceding siblings ...)
  2004-08-25 17:41 ` gcc at microbizz dot nl
@ 2005-06-13  3:36 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2005-06-13  3:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs



-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|REOPENED                    |NEW


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12869


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug debug/12869] Bad stabs for bitsize fields
  2003-11-01 11:05 [Bug debug/12869] New: " gcc at microbizz dot nl
                   ` (4 preceding siblings ...)
  2004-08-25 15:25 ` drow at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-08-25 17:41 ` gcc at microbizz dot nl
  2005-06-13  3:36 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: gcc at microbizz dot nl @ 2004-08-25 17:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From gcc at microbizz dot nl  2004-08-25 17:41 -------
Subject: Re:  Bad stabs for bitsize fields

Thanks Daniel for your additional comment.

I regret that the gpc compiler currently doesn't compile on the 
mainline. Tree SSA has broken more than one frontend. We have to catch 
up first. Once we have, it will be reproducable again in Pascal also.

Regards,

Adriaan van Os



-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12869


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug debug/12869] Bad stabs for bitsize fields
  2003-11-01 11:05 [Bug debug/12869] New: " gcc at microbizz dot nl
                   ` (3 preceding siblings ...)
  2004-08-19  2:49 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-08-25 15:25 ` drow at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-08-25 17:41 ` gcc at microbizz dot nl
  2005-06-13  3:36 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: drow at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-08-25 15:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From drow at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-08-25 15:25 -------
Andrew, that comment doesn't make any sense.  The code only occurs for two
types, so of course no other type needs it.

The bad bit of stabs is:
Datevalid:(0,5)=@s8;-16;,0,1;Timevalid:(0,5),1,1;...

(0,5),1,1 is valid for a field.  It's TYPENAME,BITOFFSET,BITLEN.
"@s8;-16" is a valid TYPENAME; the "@s8;" prefix is consumed
and the type is "-16".  "@s8;-16;" is not a valid TYPENAME; types
do not end in a semicolon.

I'm sure you could reproduce this in some other language if you tried.


-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|INVALID                     |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12869


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug debug/12869] Bad stabs for bitsize fields
  2003-11-01 11:05 [Bug debug/12869] New: " gcc at microbizz dot nl
                   ` (2 preceding siblings ...)
  2004-05-21 23:35 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-08-19  2:49 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-08-25 15:25 ` drow at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (2 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-08-19  2:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-08-19 02:49 -------
Actually I disagree with the patch as no other TYPE needs this patch, are you sure that this is not a gdb 
problem?  Also I will note that GPC cannot be compiled on the mainline at all where a bug fix would go 
first so closing as invalid.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |INVALID


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12869


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug debug/12869] Bad stabs for bitsize fields
  2003-11-01 11:05 [Bug debug/12869] New: " gcc at microbizz dot nl
  2003-11-02 21:57 ` [Bug debug/12869] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2003-11-03 14:39 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2004-05-21 23:35 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-08-19  2:49 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (3 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2004-05-21 23:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-05-20 22:47 -------
Note darwin now supports dwarf2 (except you have to have a newer gdb).

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
   Last reconfirmed|2003-11-03 14:39:52         |2004-05-20 22:47:47
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12869


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug debug/12869] Bad stabs for bitsize fields
  2003-11-01 11:05 [Bug debug/12869] New: " gcc at microbizz dot nl
  2003-11-02 21:57 ` [Bug debug/12869] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
@ 2003-11-03 14:39 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2004-05-21 23:35 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (4 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-11-03 14:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12869


pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|                            |1
           Keywords|                            |patch
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2003-11-03 14:39:52
               date|                            |


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2003-11-03 14:39 -------
The patch was posted here: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2003-11/msg00129.html>
.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

* [Bug debug/12869] Bad stabs for bitsize fields
  2003-11-01 11:05 [Bug debug/12869] New: " gcc at microbizz dot nl
@ 2003-11-02 21:57 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
  2003-11-03 14:39 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
                   ` (5 subsequent siblings)
  6 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org @ 2003-11-02 21:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: gcc-bugs

PLEASE REPLY TO gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org ONLY, *NOT* gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12869


pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |wrong-code


------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2003-11-02 21:57 -------
Could you update the patch to the mainline and submit it gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org with a 
changelog?


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2022-12-01  1:27 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <bug-12869-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2022-12-01  1:27 ` [Bug debug/12869] Bad stabs for bitsize fields pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
2003-11-01 11:05 [Bug debug/12869] New: " gcc at microbizz dot nl
2003-11-02 21:57 ` [Bug debug/12869] " pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2003-11-03 14:39 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-05-21 23:35 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-08-19  2:49 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-08-25 15:25 ` drow at gcc dot gnu dot org
2004-08-25 17:41 ` gcc at microbizz dot nl
2005-06-13  3:36 ` pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).