* [Bug c++/14179] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] out of memory while parsing array with many initializers
[not found] <bug-14179-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
@ 2011-06-27 14:05 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-13 20:42 ` [Bug c++/14179] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 " jason at gcc dot gnu.org
` (19 subsequent siblings)
20 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2011-06-27 14:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14179
Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.3.6 |4.4.7
--- Comment #59 from Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-06-27 12:13:14 UTC ---
4.3 branch is being closed, moving to 4.4.7 target.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/14179] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] out of memory while parsing array with many initializers
[not found] <bug-14179-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2011-06-27 14:05 ` [Bug c++/14179] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] out of memory while parsing array with many initializers rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-01-13 20:42 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-13 22:17 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
` (18 subsequent siblings)
20 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: jason at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-01-13 20:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14179
Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |NEW
CC| |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Blocks|12245 |
Depends on| |12245
AssignedTo|giovannibajo at libero dot |unassigned at gcc dot
|it |gnu.org
--- Comment #60 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-01-13 20:27:06 UTC ---
Giovanni hasn't touched this bug since 2004, so I'm unassigning him. It seems
to me that the best way to avoid the garbage from cp_parser_initializer_list
would be to rewrite reshape_init to avoid copying initializer lists that need
no reshaping. But that isn't a project for stage 4.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/14179] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] out of memory while parsing array with many initializers
[not found] <bug-14179-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
2011-06-27 14:05 ` [Bug c++/14179] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] out of memory while parsing array with many initializers rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-13 20:42 ` [Bug c++/14179] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 " jason at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-01-13 22:17 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-13 22:17 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
` (17 subsequent siblings)
20 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: jason at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-01-13 22:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14179
Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment #5763|0 |1
is obsolete| |
--- Comment #61 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-01-13 21:39:10 UTC ---
Created attachment 26317
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26317
Testcase with just the character array
I couldn't compile the original testcase with 2.95, so I've stripped out the
important part, which is just a massive char array.
For reference, compiling this on my Core i7 laptop (time and VM usage):
2.95 6s 717M
3.0 16s 1764M
3.2 17s 1813M
3.3 20s 2028M
3.4 15s 1803M
4.0 18s 1900M
4.1 9s 1635M
4.2 10s 1636M
4.3 9s 1158M
4.4 xxx 1161M (no time; non-optimized build)
4.5 11s 1097M
4.6 xxx 1258M (ditto)
4.7 14s 1704M (r183161, optimized, --enable-checking=release)
So there was certainly a big jump from 2.95 to 3.0. 4.3 improved memory use
quite a bit, but now it's gone up again.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/14179] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] out of memory while parsing array with many initializers
[not found] <bug-14179-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2012-01-13 22:17 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-01-13 22:17 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-14 15:58 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz
` (16 subsequent siblings)
20 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: jason at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-01-13 22:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14179
--- Comment #62 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-01-13 22:08:38 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #61)
> 4.7 14s 1704M (r183161, optimized, --enable-checking=release)
Making the change to convert_to_integer mentioned in 12245 reduces VM size to
1509M; there's another 190M of garbage from cp_parser_initializer_list, but
that still doesn't account for all the increase in VM size.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/14179] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] out of memory while parsing array with many initializers
[not found] <bug-14179-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2012-01-13 22:17 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-01-14 15:58 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz
2012-01-14 18:12 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
` (15 subsequent siblings)
20 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: hubicka at ucw dot cz @ 2012-01-14 15:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14179
--- Comment #63 from Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz> 2012-01-14 14:18:27 UTC ---
> Making the change to convert_to_integer mentioned in 12245 reduces VM size to
> 1509M; there's another 190M of garbage from cp_parser_initializer_list, but
> that still doesn't account for all the increase in VM size.
--enable-gather-detailed-mem-stats dump should pinpoint this quite easilly...
Honza
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/14179] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] out of memory while parsing array with many initializers
[not found] <bug-14179-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2012-01-14 15:58 ` hubicka at ucw dot cz
@ 2012-01-14 18:12 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-16 16:45 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
` (14 subsequent siblings)
20 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: jason at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-01-14 18:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14179
--- Comment #64 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-01-14 17:06:46 UTC ---
Yep, it turned out that there was a lot of allocation overhead from vector
allocation in the token buffer. After fixing that as well with the patch at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-01/msg00732.html
this testcase is down to 967MB VM size. The only obvious area of improvement
left is the 67MB of garbage from unnecessary reshape_init copying, which seems
like more work than it's worth for this testcase, and definitely not something
for 4.7.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/14179] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] out of memory while parsing array with many initializers
[not found] <bug-14179-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2012-01-14 18:12 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-01-16 16:45 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-01-16 16:55 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
` (13 subsequent siblings)
20 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: jason at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-01-16 16:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14179
--- Comment #65 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-01-16 16:40:36 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Jan 16 16:40:26 2012
New Revision: 183213
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183213
Log:
PR c++/14179
* vec.c (vec_gc_o_reserve_1): Use ggc_round_alloc_size.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/vec.c
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/14179] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] out of memory while parsing array with many initializers
[not found] <bug-14179-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2012-01-16 16:45 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-01-16 16:55 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-03-13 13:48 ` [Bug c++/14179] [4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (12 subsequent siblings)
20 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: jason at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-01-16 16:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14179
--- Comment #66 from Jason Merrill <jason at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-01-16 16:40:49 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Jan 16 16:40:38 2012
New Revision: 183214
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183214
Log:
PR c/12245
PR c++/14179
* convert.c (convert_to_integer): Use fold_convert for
converting an INTEGER_CST to integer type.
Modified:
trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
trunk/gcc/convert.c
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/14179] [4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] out of memory while parsing array with many initializers
[not found] <bug-14179-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2012-01-16 16:55 ` jason at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-03-13 13:48 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2012-07-02 13:38 ` [Bug c++/14179] [4.6/4.7/4.8 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (11 subsequent siblings)
20 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-03-13 13:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14179
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.4.7 |4.5.4
--- Comment #67 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-03-13 12:46:06 UTC ---
4.4 branch is being closed, moving to 4.5.4 target.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/14179] [4.6/4.7/4.8 Regression] out of memory while parsing array with many initializers
[not found] <bug-14179-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2012-03-13 13:48 ` [Bug c++/14179] [4.5/4.6/4.7/4.8 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2012-07-02 13:38 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2013-04-12 15:16 ` [Bug c++/14179] [4.7/4.8/4.9 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (10 subsequent siblings)
20 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2012-07-02 13:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14179
Richard Guenther <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.5.4 |4.6.4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/14179] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] out of memory while parsing array with many initializers
[not found] <bug-14179-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2012-07-02 13:38 ` [Bug c++/14179] [4.6/4.7/4.8 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2013-04-12 15:16 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-06-12 13:44 ` [Bug c++/14179] [4.7/4.8/4.9/4.10 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (9 subsequent siblings)
20 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2013-04-12 15:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14179
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.6.4 |4.7.4
--- Comment #68 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-04-12 15:16:18 UTC ---
GCC 4.6.4 has been released and the branch has been closed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/14179] [4.7/4.8/4.9/4.10 Regression] out of memory while parsing array with many initializers
[not found] <bug-14179-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (10 preceding siblings ...)
2013-04-12 15:16 ` [Bug c++/14179] [4.7/4.8/4.9 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-06-12 13:44 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2014-12-19 13:36 ` [Bug c++/14179] [4.8/4.9/5 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (8 subsequent siblings)
20 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-06-12 13:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14179
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.7.4 |4.8.4
--- Comment #69 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The 4.7 branch is being closed, moving target milestone to 4.8.4.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/14179] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] out of memory while parsing array with many initializers
[not found] <bug-14179-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (11 preceding siblings ...)
2014-06-12 13:44 ` [Bug c++/14179] [4.7/4.8/4.9/4.10 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2014-12-19 13:36 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-06-23 8:20 ` [Bug c++/14179] [4.8/4.9/5/6 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (7 subsequent siblings)
20 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2014-12-19 13:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14179
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.8.4 |4.8.5
--- Comment #70 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 4.8.4 has been released.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/14179] [4.8/4.9/5/6 Regression] out of memory while parsing array with many initializers
[not found] <bug-14179-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (12 preceding siblings ...)
2014-12-19 13:36 ` [Bug c++/14179] [4.8/4.9/5 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-06-23 8:20 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-06-26 20:10 ` [Bug c++/14179] [4.9/5/6 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (6 subsequent siblings)
20 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-06-23 8:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14179
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.8.5 |4.9.3
--- Comment #71 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
The gcc-4_8-branch is being closed, re-targeting regressions to 4.9.3.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/14179] [4.9/5/6 Regression] out of memory while parsing array with many initializers
[not found] <bug-14179-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (13 preceding siblings ...)
2015-06-23 8:20 ` [Bug c++/14179] [4.8/4.9/5/6 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-06-26 20:10 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2015-06-26 20:35 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (5 subsequent siblings)
20 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-06-26 20:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14179
--- Comment #72 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 4.9.3 has been released.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/14179] [4.9/5/6 Regression] out of memory while parsing array with many initializers
[not found] <bug-14179-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (14 preceding siblings ...)
2015-06-26 20:10 ` [Bug c++/14179] [4.9/5/6 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2015-06-26 20:35 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-05-14 9:45 ` [Bug c++/14179] [9/10/11/12 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
` (4 subsequent siblings)
20 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2015-06-26 20:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14179
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|4.9.3 |4.9.4
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/14179] [9/10/11/12 Regression] out of memory while parsing array with many initializers
[not found] <bug-14179-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (15 preceding siblings ...)
2015-06-26 20:35 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-05-14 9:45 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2021-06-01 8:03 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (3 subsequent siblings)
20 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-05-14 9:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14179
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|8.5 |9.4
--- Comment #85 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 8 branch is being closed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/14179] [9/10/11/12 Regression] out of memory while parsing array with many initializers
[not found] <bug-14179-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (16 preceding siblings ...)
2021-05-14 9:45 ` [Bug c++/14179] [9/10/11/12 " jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2021-06-01 8:03 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-05-27 9:33 ` [Bug c++/14179] [10/11/12/13 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
` (2 subsequent siblings)
20 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2021-06-01 8:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14179
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|9.4 |9.5
--- Comment #86 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 9.4 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 9.5.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/14179] [10/11/12/13 Regression] out of memory while parsing array with many initializers
[not found] <bug-14179-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (17 preceding siblings ...)
2021-06-01 8:03 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-05-27 9:33 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
2022-06-28 10:28 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-07 10:28 ` [Bug c++/14179] [11/12/13/14 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
20 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-05-27 9:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14179
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|9.5 |10.4
--- Comment #87 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 9 branch is being closed
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/14179] [10/11/12/13 Regression] out of memory while parsing array with many initializers
[not found] <bug-14179-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (18 preceding siblings ...)
2022-05-27 9:33 ` [Bug c++/14179] [10/11/12/13 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2022-06-28 10:28 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
2023-07-07 10:28 ` [Bug c++/14179] [11/12/13/14 " rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
20 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2022-06-28 10:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14179
Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|10.4 |10.5
--- Comment #88 from Jakub Jelinek <jakub at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 10.4 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 10.5.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread* [Bug c++/14179] [11/12/13/14 Regression] out of memory while parsing array with many initializers
[not found] <bug-14179-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
` (19 preceding siblings ...)
2022-06-28 10:28 ` jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
@ 2023-07-07 10:28 ` rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
20 siblings, 0 replies; 21+ messages in thread
From: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org @ 2023-07-07 10:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14179
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|10.5 |11.5
--- Comment #89 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 10 branch is being closed.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 21+ messages in thread