[Bug target/14352] New FP code not compiled for non-arm-elf targets

[Bug target/14352] New FP code not compiled for non-arm-elf targets

[rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org]

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14352

Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |WONTFIX
   Target Milestone|---                         |4.8.0

--- Comment #7 from Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org> 2012-07-10 09:08:27 UTC ---
The none EABI configuration of arm-linux is no longer supported.

[Bug target/14352] New FP code not compiled for non-arm-elf targets

[ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Comment #6 from ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org  2010-03-22 21:46 -------
This refers to the arm-linux and arm-elf configurations which are largely in
maintenance mode only now. Pulling priority down to P5 and marking as an
enhancement. 


-- 

ramana at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Severity|normal                      |enhancement
           Priority|P2                          |P5


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14352

[Bug target/14352] New: New FP code not compiled for non-arm-elf targets

[drow at gcc dot gnu dot org]

Most of the ARM target makefile fragments reference arm/lib1funcs.asm, but only
t-arm-elf references all the symbols that need to be defined to get the new
floating point code:
LIB1ASMFUNCS = _udivsi3 _divsi3 _umodsi3 _modsi3 _dvmd_tls _bb_init_func \
        _call_via_rX _interwork_call_via_rX \
        _negdf2 _addsubdf3 _muldivdf3 _cmpdf2 _unorddf2 _fixdfsi _fixunsdfsi \
        _truncdfsf2 _negsf2 _addsubsf3 _muldivsf3 _cmpsf2 _unordsf2 \
        _fixsfsi _fixunssfsi

t-linux just says this:

LIB1ASMFUNCS = _udivsi3 _divsi3 _umodsi3 _modsi3 _dvmd_lnx

This generates undefined references in libgcc_s.so to, for instance, the functions
defined by L_addsubdf3.

If I copy LIB1ASMFUNCS from t-arm-elf to t-linux that solves the problem (for
this particular target at least, and keeping _dvmd_lnx...)

-- 
           Summary: New FP code not compiled for non-arm-elf targets
           Product: gcc
           Version: 3.4.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: target
        AssignedTo: rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org
        ReportedBy: drow at gcc dot gnu dot org
                CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC target triplet: arm-unknown-linux-gnu


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14352

[Bug target/14352] New FP code not compiled for non-arm-elf targets

[rearnsha at arm dot com]

------- Additional Comments From rearnsha at arm dot com  2004-03-01 10:48 -------
Subject: Re:  New: New FP code not compiled for 
 non-arm-elf targets

> t-linux just says this:
> 
> LIB1ASMFUNCS = _udivsi3 _divsi3 _umodsi3 _modsi3 _dvmd_lnx
> 
> This generates undefined references in libgcc_s.so to, for instance, the functions
> defined by L_addsubdf3.
> 
> If I copy LIB1ASMFUNCS from t-arm-elf to t-linux that solves the problem (for
> this particular target at least, and keeping _dvmd_lnx...)

t-linux is not a soft-float target, so shouldn't need any of the FP 
support functions.

R.



-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14352

[Bug target/14352] New FP code not compiled for non-arm-elf targets

[drow at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Additional Comments From drow at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-03-01 14:39 -------
Subject: Re:  New FP code not compiled for non-arm-elf targets

But this prevents using it with -msoft-float; which is often
advantageous.  Hmm, I'm not sure how best to do it, but I'd like to
make this new requirement clearer - especially now that we have
--with-float=soft.


-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14352

[Bug target/14352] New FP code not compiled for non-arm-elf targets

[drow at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Additional Comments From drow at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-04-13 23:57 -------
I just ran into this again.  Richard, I know the soft-float routines are not
generally needed, but would there be any harm in building them anyway?

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14352

[Bug target/14352] New FP code not compiled for non-arm-elf targets

[drow at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Additional Comments From drow at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-04-14 00:07 -------
An alternative would be to detect --with-float=soft in t-linux, and adjust
LIB1ASMFUNCS.  I think that can be done.

-- 


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14352

[Bug target/14352] New FP code not compiled for non-arm-elf targets

[pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org]

------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org  2004-07-14 00:21 -------
Confirmed.

-- 
           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEW
     Ever Confirmed|                            |1
   Last reconfirmed|0000-00-00 00:00:00         |2004-07-14 00:21:42
               date|                            |


http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14352