https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14541

--- Comment #20 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> ---
On Mon, 8 Dec 2014, ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:

> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14541
> 
> ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
> 
>            What    |Removed                     |Added
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>                  CC|                            |ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
> 
> --- Comment #19 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #18)
> > Author: rguenth
> > Date: Wed Dec  3 11:55:14 2014
> > New Revision: 218308
> > 
> > URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=218308&root=gcc&view=rev
> > Log:
> > 2014-12-03  Richard Biener  <rguenther@suse.de>
> > 
> > 	PR middle-end/14541
> > 	* builtins.c (fold_builtin_logarithm): Implement simplifications ...
> > 	* match.pd: ... here as patterns.
> > 
> > Modified:
> >     trunk/gcc/ChangeLog
> >     trunk/gcc/builtins.c
> >     trunk/gcc/match.pd
> 
> With this commit the builtin-explog-1.c test stops folding the builtins on
> aarch64 (and consequently FAILs)

Which one exactly?  That is, what is the failing link output?
>From gcc-bugs-return-469705-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org Mon Dec 08 10:37:00 2014
Return-Path: <gcc-bugs-return-469705-listarch-gcc-bugs=gcc.gnu.org@gcc.gnu.org>
Delivered-To: listarch-gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 26341 invoked by alias); 8 Dec 2014 10:37:00 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <gcc-bugs.gcc.gnu.org>
List-Archive: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gcc-bugs-help@gcc.gnu.org>
Sender: gcc-bugs-owner@gcc.gnu.org
Delivered-To: mailing list gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Received: (qmail 26278 invoked by uid 48); 8 Dec 2014 10:36:56 -0000
From: "ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org" <gcc-bugzilla@gcc.gnu.org>
To: gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [Bug tree-optimization/14541] [tree-ssa] built-in math functions are not fully optimized at tree level
Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 10:37:00 -0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: gcc
X-Bugzilla-Component: tree-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Version: tree-ssa
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: missed-optimization
X-Bugzilla-Severity: enhancement
X-Bugzilla-Who: ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: ASSIGNED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: P2
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags:
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: attachments.created
Message-ID: <bug-14541-4-cH13ukDQJ1@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-14541-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-14541-4@http.gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-SW-Source: 2014-12/txt/msg00712.txt.bz2
Content-length: 461

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id541

--- Comment #21 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 34215
  --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id4215&actioníit
Link errors output for aarch64

> Which one exactly?  That is, what is the failing link output?

All of them AFAICS. I'm attaching the link failures log.

The test PASSes at -O2 -flto and -O2 -flto -flto-partition=none

but FAILs on all other torture options